Article
Article name Axiological Space of Phraseological Units with a Positive Valuation
Authors Krasnobaeva-Chernaya Z.V. Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, prikladnik1@mail.ru
Bibliographic description
Section Linguistic worldview
UDK 81’373.72+81’272
DOI
Article type
Annotation The paper defines the specifics of axiological space of phraseological units with a positive valuation. The evaluative phraseological units are realized in seven semantic ranges “good – bad”, “to approve – to disapprove”, “to satisfy – to dissatisfy”, “valuable – not valuable”, “to interest – not to interest”, “to confirm – to deny”, “to follow the norm – not to follow the norm”. Thus, the valuation types of the phraseological units are classified as: the phrasemes with positive valuation (“good”, “to approve”, “to satisfy”, “valuable”, “to interest”, “to confirm”, “to abide by norms”), the phrasemes with a negative valuation (“bad”, “to disapprove”, “to dissatisfy”, “not valuable”, “not to interest”, “to deny”, “not to follow the norm”), the phraseological units with diffuse valuation (the valuation type is determined contextually). The object of the research is valuation, and the subject is the phraseological units with a positive valuation. The novelty of this work is the research material and the research approach. The method of component analysis made it possible to fix that the positive valuation meaning of the phrasemes is formed in presence of: a) words with a positive connotation as part of the phraseological units; b) emotional associations aligned with a phraseme’s concrete component or a situation that underlies the phraseological unit; c) connotative markers lexicalized in lexicographical sources. The value of the research consists in possibility to use its results in practice of teaching courses “General Linguistics”, “Linguistic axiology” and special courses like “Phraseology in national-language pictures of the world”, “Semantics and Pragmatics of phraseological units” and others.
Key words axiology, valuation, evaluative phraseme, phraseme with a positive valuation, phraseology
Article information
References 1. Averina M. A., Shishkova K. S. Kontsept «radost’» v russkoi fol’klornoi kartine mira // Innovatsii v nauke. 2013. № 20. S. 33–39. 2. Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1999. 896 s. 3. Babaeva E. V. Kul’turno-yazykovye kharakteristiki otnosheniya k sobstvennosti (na materiale nemetskogo i russkogo yazykov): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.20. Volgograd, 1997. 22 s. 4. Balakina Z. Yu. Emotsional’nye kontsepty «radost’» i «joy» v slovarnykh stat’yakh russkogo i angliiskogo yazykov // Antropologicheskaya lingvistika: problemy lingvokontseptologii, lingvisticheskoi genderologii, lingvistiki teksta, semantiki i stilistiki: sb. nauch. tr. Volgograd: Kolledzh, 2004. S. 17–21. 5. Borisovskaya I. B. Verbalizatsiya kontsepta «radost’» predlozheniyami izmeneniya v nemetskom yazyke // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 5. Ch. 2.S. 37–40. 6. Vol’f E. M. Funktsional’naya semantika otsenki // Lingvisticheskoe nasledie XX veka. M.: KomKniga, 2006.280 s. 7. Gavrilova E. D. Otsenochnye kategorii «good» i «bad» v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.04. Tambov, 2005. 172 s. 8. Gak V. G. Emotsii i otsenki v strukture vyskazyvaniya // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 9: Filologiya. M., 1997. № 3. S. 87– 93. 9. Gibatova G. D. Semanticheskaya kategoriya otsenki i sredstva ee vyrazheniya v yazyke: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.01. Ufa, 1996. 25 s. 10. Kalkina E. N. Strukturno-semanticheskaya kharakteristika sredstv vyrazheniya kategorii otsenki v nemetskom i altaiskom yazykakh: v antropotsentricheskom aspekte: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.20. Kazan’, 2005. 253 s. 11. Lyzlov A. I. Otsenka i yazykovye sposoby ee vyrazheniya v paremiyakh (na materiale komparativnykh i negativnykh konstruktsii angliiskogo yazyka): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.19. M., 2009. 22 s. 12. Lyapon M. V. Otsenochnaya situatsiya i slovesnoe modelirovanie // Yazyk i lichnost’. M.: Nauka 1989. S. 24–33. 13. Nikitin M. V. Zametki ob otsenke i otsenochnykh znacheniyakh // StudiaLinguistica: kognitivnopragmaticheskie i khudozhestvennye funktsii yazyka. SPb.: Trigon, 2000. S. 6–22. 14. Teliya V. N. Mekhanizmy ekspressivnoi okraski yazykovykh edinits // Chelovecheskii faktor v yazyke. Yazykovye mekhanizmy ekspressivnosti. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, 1991. S. 36–66. 15. Yakhina A. M. Otsenochnost’ kak komponent znacheniya frazeologicheskikh edinits v russkom, angliiskom i tatarskom yazykakh (na materiale glagol’nykh frazeologicheskikh edinits, oboznachayushchikh povedenie cheloveka): dis. ... kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.20. Kazan’, 2008. 226 s. 16. Bessonova O. L. Otsіnnii tezaurus anglіis’koї movi: kognіtivno-gendernі aspekti. Donets’k: DonNU, 2002. 362 s. 17. Kosmeda T. A. Aksіologіchnі aspekti pragmalіngvіstiki: formuvannya і rozvitok kategorії otsіnki. L’vіv: LNU іm І. Franka, 2000. 350 s. 18. Onishchenko І. V. Kategorіya otsіnki ta zasobi її virazhennya v publіtsistichnikh ta іnformatsіinikh tekstakh: avtoref. dis. … kand. fіlol. nauk: 10.02.01. Dnіpropetrovs’k, 2004. 19 s. 19. Sarbash O. L. Leksichna reprezentatsіya kontseptu zadovolennya v anglіis’kіi, ukraїns’kіi ta novogrets’kіi movakh // Lіngvіstichnі studії: zb. nauk. prats’. Donets’k: DonNU, 2012. Vip. 25. S. 158–162. 20. Shamaєva Yu. Yu. Kognіtivna stuktura kontseptu «radіst’» (na materіalі anglіis’koї movi): avtoref. dis. ... kand. fіlol. nauk: 10.02.04. Kharkіv, 2004. 20 s. Istochniki 21. Kunin A. V. Bol’shoi anglo-russkii frazeologicheskii slovar’. M.: Zhivoi yazyk, 2005. 944 s. 22. Nemetsko-russkii frazeologicheskii slovar’ / sost. L. E. Binovich, N. N. Grishin; pod red. Malige-Klappenbakh. Kiev: Agrikola; M.: Rus. yaz., 1975. 656 s. 23. Frazeologicheskii slovar’ russkogo yazyka / pod red. A. I. Molotkova. M.: Sov. entsikl., 1967. 534 s. 24. Slovnik frazeologіzmіv ukraїns’koї movi / V. M. Bіlonozhenko, І. S. Gnatyuk, V. V. Dyatchuk ta іn. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 2003. 1104 s.
Full articleAxiological Space of Phraseological Units with a Positive Valuation
0
12