| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Journalism in Ethno-Political Communications: Tolerance Interpretation |
| Authors | Blokhin I.N. Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, igor.blohin@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | POLITICAL SCIENCE |
| UDK | 323.1 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | In article the concept of journalistic activity in the sphere of ethno-political communication is presented. The author analyses the conditions for journalism to execute the political institution functions. The rationale for journalism participation in the communication processes in specific situations of social and political relations due to the specifics of the communications subjects. The article highlights the aspects of journalistic activities in the conditions of ethnopolitical communications, defined specificity and presents possible options analysis. The author examines the concept of “tolerance” depending on the political and cultural context, defines the value of tolerance as communication compatibility. The article analyses the differences in the interpretation of tolerance along the lines of “majority minority” and “natural artificial (imagined) community”. The author proposes a model of communications analysis, taking into account the characteristics of compatibility: political, international, economic, social, cultural, historical, religious, demographic, racial-anthropological, linguistic, environmental, and psychological. In the article the author criticizes the modern regulatory approach to the management of ethnopolitical communications, discusses the interpretation of tolerance formed in the journalistic community as a communicative, ideological, cultural and attitudinal openness and equal status of ethno-political, ethno-cultural dialogue. |
| Key words | communication, journalism, publicism, tolerance, communicative compatibility, identity |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma / per. s angl. V. Nikolaeva. M.: KANON-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole, 2001. 288 s. 2. Bakhtin M. M. Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo // Bakhtin M. M. Sobr. soch. v 7 tt. T.2. M.: Russkie slovari, 2000. S. 5–175. 3. Vol’ton D. Informatsiya ne znachit kommunikatsiya / per. s frants. M.: POLPRED Spravochniki, 2011. 37 s. 4. Kodeks pechati s direktivami otnositel’no redaktsionnoi deyatel’nosti. Germanskii sovet po delam pechati // Sovokupnost’ pravovykh norm, kasayushchikhsya pechati. Rainbakh: Inter Natsiones, 1996. 36 s. 5. Kozlovskii V. V. Landshaft sotsial’noi i mezhkul’turnoi kommunikatsii: mezhdu konfliktom i tolerantnost’yu // Sotsial’nye kommunikatsii: novoe v nauke, obrazovanii, tekhnologiyakh: mater. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. SPb.: Roza mira, 2004. S. 188–190. 6. Patriarkh Kirill. Tolerantnost’ – proidennyi put’ v razvitii mezhreligioznykh otnoshenii. URL: http://www.pravmir.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 30.04.2014). 7. Pravovye i eticheskie normy v zhurnalistike / sost. E. P. Prokhorov, G. M. Pshenichnyi, V. M. Khrul’. M.: Aspekt Press, 2004. 222 s. 8. Prilepin Zakhar. Put’ pokoleniya // Den’ literatury. 2013. №11. 9. Tolerantnost’ / obshch. red. M. P. Mchedlova. M.: Respublika, 2004. 416 s. 10. Federal’noe sobranie Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Gosudarstvennaya Duma: URL:http:// asozd2.duma.gov.ru (data obrashcheniya: 30.04.2014). |
| Full article | Journalism in Ethno-Political Communications: Tolerance Interpretation |
| 0 | |
| 8 | |
