| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Using the Linguistic Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIPVU) on a Russian Corpus: Rules Revised and Extended |
| Authors | Isaeva E.V. Senior Lecturer, ekaterinaisae@gmail.comShekhtman N.G. Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, natalia.sh2@gmail.comKerimov R.D. Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, kerimovrus@rambler.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | RUSSIAN PHILOLOGY |
| UDK | 81’ 373.612.2 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The paper gives a brief overview of the linguistic metaphor identification procedure (MIPVU) which was adopted as a methodological basis for the shallow annotation scheme of the Russian-language corpus of conceptual metaphor. The paper also describes the results of the two annotation reliability tests in terms of inter-annotator agreement. The first reliability test, in which annotators used the brief version of the MIPVU rules, yielded results below both the generally accepted statistical threshold and the results reported by the VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. We present the revised and extended version of MIPVU rules specifically adjusted to the Russian dictionaries deployed in annotation. Used in the second reliability test, the extended set of rules resulted in a significant increase of inter-annotator agreement which rose well above the threshold and reached the level of agreement in the VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. |
| Key words | linguistic metaphor identification procedure (MIPVU), Russian-language corpus of conceptual metaphor, shallow annotation, reliability test, inter-annotator agreement, VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus, revised and extended rules |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Badryzlova Ju. G., Kerimov R. D., Shehtman N. G. Osnovnye metody i principy sozdanija russkojazychnogo korpusa konceptual’noj metafory: opyt razmetki s primeneniem instrumenta BRAT. (V pechati). 2. Ermakova L. M., Badryzlova Ju. G. Statisticheskaja ocenka mery soglasovannosti na poverhnostnom urovne razmetki russkojazychnogo korpusa (s primeneniem procedury lingvisticheskoj identifikacii metafory MIPVU). (V pechati) 3. Isaeva E. V. Metaforicheskaja model’ «kiberterrorizm – vojna»: prakticheskoe primenenie procedury identifikacii metafory (MIPVU) i pjatishagovogo analiza // Jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal «Jazykovye i filologicheskie issledovanija». 2012. Maj. Vyp. 4. T. 2. S. 11–16. URL: http://www. language-and-philological-researches.ingnpublishing. com/archive/2012_release_4/volume_2_ may/ekaterina_v_isaeva_metaphorical_model_cyberterrorism. 4. Isaeva E. V. Metaforicheskaja model’ «kiberterrorizm – teatr»: prakticheskoe primenenie procedury identifikacii metafory (MIPVU) i pjatishagovogo analiza // Kognitivnye issledovanija jazyka. Tambov : Izd-vo RALK, 2012. Vyp. 11: Mezhdunar. kongress po kognitivnoj lingvistike. S. 131–134. 5. Kerimov R. D. Artefaktnaja metaforika v politicheskom diskurse FRG: uch. posobie / GOU VPO «Kemerovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet». Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2008. 168 s. 6. Maslova V. A. Kognitivnaja lingvistika: uch. posobie. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. Minsk: TetraSistems, 2008. 272 s. 7. Mishlanova S. L., Isaeva E. V., Poljakova S. V. Kompleksnyj podhod k izucheniju metafory: ot znakovoj sistemy k kognitivnym processam // Lingvisticheskie chtenija – 2012. Perm’: Izd-vo Prikamskogo social’n. in-ta, 2012. Cikl 8: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Perm’, 15 fevralja 2012 g.). S. 64–72. 8. Mishlanova S. L., Isaeva E. V. Stereotipnost’ i tvorchestvo v sovremennyh issledovanijah metafory // Stereotipnost’ i tvorchestvo v tekste: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. / pod red. M. P. Kotjurovoj. Perm’: Izd-vo PermGU, 2012. Vyp. 16. C. 235–247. 9. Slovar’ lingvisticheskih terminov. 5-e izd., ispr. i dop. / pod red. T. V. Zherebilo. Nazran’: Piligrim, 2010. 486 s. 10. Chudinov A. P. Rossija v metaforicheskom zerkale: kognitivnoe issledovanie politicheskoj metafory (1991–2000): monografija. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGPU, 2001. 240 s. 11. Carletta J. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the Kappa statistic // Computational Linguistics. 1996. 2 (22). Pp. 249–254. 12. Feng X. Konzeptuelle Metaphern und Textkohdrenz. T’bingen : Narr, 2003. 301 S. 13. Gholamrezazadeh S., Salehi M. A., Gholamzadeh B. A comprehensive survey on text summarization systems // Proceedings of CSA 2009: The 2nd international conference on computer science and its applications. Jeju, 2009. Pp. 1–6. 14. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We live by. Chicago, London : The University of Chicago Press, 1980. XIII, 242 p. 15. Saggion H., Radev D., Teufel S., Lam W., Strassel S. M. Developing Infrastructure for the Evaluation of Single and Multi-document Summarization Systems in a Cross-lingual Environment // Proceedings of LREC 2002: The 3rd international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Las Palmas, 29–31 May 2002). Las Palmas, 2002. Pp. 747–754. 16. Steen G. J., Dorst A. G., Herrmann J. B., Kaal A. A., Krennmayr T., Pasma T. A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. 238 p. 17. VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. URL: http://ota.ahds.ac.uk/ headers/2541.xml. Spisok slovarej i ih sokrashhenij 1. NKRJa – Nacional’nyj korpus russkogo jazyka. URL: http://ruscorpora.ru/. 2. SRJa – Slovar’ russkogo jazyka: v 4 t. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. / pod red. A. P. Evgen’evoj; AN SSSR, In-t rus. jaz. M. : Russkij jazyk, 1981–1984. URL: http://slovari.ru/ 3. TSRJa – Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskih vyrazhenij. 4-e izd., dop. / pod red. S. I. Ozhegova, N. Ju. Shvedovoj; RAN, In-t rus. jaz. im. V. V. Vinogradova. M.: Azbukovnik, 1999. URL: http://slovari.ru/. |
| Full article | Using the Linguistic Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIPVU) on a Russian Corpus: Rules Revised and Extended |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
