| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Interaction of Visual Art and Literature in Nabokov’s Literary World |
| Authors | Dmitrienko O.A. Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor,, da_olga@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | RUSSIAN PHILOLOGY |
| UDK | 882 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article studies the problem of interdisciplinary interaction of painting and literature which attests to intermedial character of Nabokov’s prose written in Russian. He inherits the tradition rooted in symbolists’ art. Intermediality, a characteristic feature of a symbolist text, is manifested in the dialogue, synthesis of arts, and visualization of metaphysical ideas. Possibilities of interdisciplinary interaction of painting and literature were also investigated by Pre-Raphaelite artists and poets. Ekphrasis is a traditional type of intermedial interaction. Lithography of The Last Supper by Leonardo serves as an “ekphratic impulse” due to which the theme of emigrants’ life is disclosed in the novel Mary. In the novel Glory the allusion to the painting Whirlwind by F. Malyavin is connected with the theme of nostalgia and the dream of free and beautiful life that did not come true. The theme reflected in painting is exposed in different semiotic systems. It becomes polyphonic. Nabokov is not limited by the stylistic device of ekphrasis. He employs less strict means of interaction between painting and literature such as intermedial allusions and correlations. |
| Key words | intermedial allusions, correlation, ekphrasis, aesthetic statement, symbolists’ tradition, Pre-Raphaelites, area of two semiotic systems |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Bakanova T. P. Artur Sajmonz i Obri Berdsli // Zhanrovoe svoeobrazie i stil’. M., 1985. 312 c. 2. Braginskaja N. V. Kenezis «Kartin» Filostrata Starshego // Pojetika drevnegrecheskoj literatury. M., 1981. 537 c. 3. Braginskaja N. V. Jekfrasis kak tip teksta (k probleme strukturnoj klassifikacii) // Slavjanskoe i balkanskoe jazykoznanie. Karpato-vostochnoslavjanskie paralleli. Struktura balkanskogo teksta. M., 1977. 590 c. 4. Val’ter Pater. Renessans: Ocherki istorii iskusstva i pojezii. M., 1912. 487 c. 5. Geller L. Na podstupah k zhanru jekfrasisa. Russkij fon dlja nerusskih kartin // Wiener Slawistisher Almanach. 1997. Sdb. 44. Cit. po: Rubinchik O. E. «Esli by ja byla zhivopiscem…» // Izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo v tvorcheskoj masterskoj Anny Ahmatovoj. SPb.: Serebrjanyj vek, 2010. 350 s. 6. Lotman Ju. M. Tekst v tekste. Stat’i po semiotike i tipologii kul’tury. Tekst kak semioticheskaja problema // Lotman Ju. M. Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 t. T. 1. Tallinn: Aleksandra, 1992. 402 s. 7. Lotman Ju. M. Tekst i poliglotizm kul’tury // Stat’i po semiotike i tipologii kul’tury. Tekst kak semioticheskaja problema // Lotman Ju. M. Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 t. T. 1. Tallinn: Aleksandra, 1992. 402 s. 8. Nabokov V. Sobr. soch. amerikanskogo perioda: v 5 t. T. 3. SPb.: Simpozium, 1997. 704 s. 9. Nabokov V. Sobr. soch.: v 4 t. T. 2. M.: Pravda, 1990. 450 s. 10. Nabokov V. Sobr. soch.: v 4 t. T. 3. M.: Pravda, 1990. 480 s. 11. Timashkov A. K istorii ponjatija «intermedial’nost’» v zapadnoevropejskoj nauke // Intermedial’nost’ v russkoj kul’ture XVIII–XX vv. / pod red. I. P. Smirnova i O. M. Goncharovoj. SPb., 2008. S. 160–168. 12. Titarenko S. D. Problema intermedial’nosti i tradicii «Jemblemat» u Pavla Florenskogo i Vjacheslava Ivanova // Mistrzowi I Przyjacielowi: Pamici Profesora Zbigniewa Baraskiego. Wroclaw, 2010. S. 411–422. 13. Tishunina N. V. Zapadnoevropejskij simvolizm i problema vzaimodejstvija iskusstv: Opyt intermedial’nogo analiza. SPb.: Izd. RGPU im. A. I. Gercena, 1998. 160 s. |
| Full article | Interaction of Visual Art and Literature in Nabokov’s Literary World |
| 0 | |
| 10 | |
