| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Socio-philosophical Analysis of Ethnocultural Diversity |
| Authors | Zimina N.S. Candidate of Philosophy, 13zimina@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Zimina N. S. Socio-philosophical Analysis of Ethnocultural Diversity // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 2. PP. 13–19. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-2-13-19. |
| Section | Social philosophy |
| UDK | 171 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-2-13-19 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | In the globalizing world today, there is an interweaving complex and the unity of local, regional and national traditions. There is a need to explain the ongoing social processes and their cultural conditionality. Ethnoculturalism always remains a topical issue and is of interest both for theoretical understanding and for applied research. More than 190 nations live in Russia. Its ethnocultural diversity is its ontologizing feature. Each ethnos has its differences, features, in the course of interaction, the influence of ethnoses on each other also occurs. At the same time, ethnic cultures are included in the multi-layered Russian socio-cultural space. It is defined as a structured (in the unity of culture and sociality) form of the organization of human being and society, which determines their livelihoods. A socio-philosophical study of ethnocultural diversity is based on the principle of determinism (the interrelation of ethnic processes and, in general, social, the need to understand and accept the characteristics of ethnic culture). The study is based on a comprehensive methodological approach, which allowed us to determine ethnocultural diversity objectively and multilaterally. Socio-philosophical analysis of ethnocultural diversity allowed us to present it as a manifestation of the many peculiarities of ethnic cultures, their traditional values, meanings, norms of attitudes and behavioral characteristics expressed in the material and spiritual life of the people. |
| Key words | ethnos, ethnicity, culture, ethnic culture, Russian socio-cultural space |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Abdulatipov, R. G. The national question and the government of Russia. M: Slavyanskij dialog, 2000. (In Rus.) 2. Arutyunov, S. A. Peoples and cultures: development and interaction. M: Nauka, 1989. (In Rus.) 3. Arutyunov, S. A. Silhouettes of ethnicity on a civilized background. M: INFRA-M, 2012. (In Rus.) 4. Axiezer, A. S. Russia: a critique of historical experience (sociocultural dynamics of Russia). From the past to the future. v 2 t. T. 1. Novosibirsk, 1997. (In Rus.) 5. Bromlej, Y. V. Ethnic processes in the modern world. M: Nauka, 1987. (In Rus.) 6. Karpushina, L. P. The value of using ethnocultural approach in education. Proceedings of higher educational institutions. Volga region. Humanitarian sciences. Pedagogy, no.4, pp. 168–173, 2012. (In Rus.) 7. Lapin, N. I. From sociocultural to anthroposocietal approach. Web. 22.12.2018. http://www.lib.socio.msu.ru/l/library. (In Rus.) 8. Lapin, N. I. Region, its status and functions in Russian society: theoretical and methodological foundations of the study. Web. 03.02.2019. http://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/08–2006/lapin.pdf (In Rus.) 9. Maurich, U. Educational problems in the context of ethnocultural diversity and the role of the teacher. Web. 08.12.2018. http://www.pandia.ru/text/80/217/31328.php (In Rus.) 10. Orlova, E. A. Socio-cultural space of everyday life. Web. 21.12.2018. http://www.countries.ru/library/ antropology/orlova. (In Rus.) 11. Ry’bakov, S. E. Ethnos philosophy. M: IPK Gossluzhby’, 2001. (In Rus.) 12. Subbotina, N. D., Fomina, M. N. Social and natural factors of interethnic conflicts and ways to overcome them. Problems of the relationship of the natural and social in society and man. Proceedings of the 9th All-Russian Scientific Conference with international participation. Chita: 2018: 230–239. (In Rus.) 13. Tishkov, V. A. Ethnology and politics. Scientific journalism. M: Nauka, 2001. (In Rus.) 14. Toshhenko, Z. T. Antinomy ‒ a new characteristic of public consciousness in modern Russia. Web. 12.12.2018. http://www.toschenko.ru/publication/6. (In Rus.) 15. Flier, A. Y. Culturology 20 – 11. Author’s collection of essays and articles. M: Soglasie, 2011. (In Rus.) 16. Xegaj, V. V. The problem of ethnocultural diversity of rural schools. Pedagogical image. Web. 05.09.2018. https://www.cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problema-etnokulturnogo‒ mnogoobraziya-selskih-shkol (In Rus.) 17. Hall, S. The Local and the Global: Globalization and Ethnicity. In King, A. D., editor Culture, Globalization and the World-System. Contemporary Conditions for the Representation of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997: 19–41. (In Engl.) 18. Held, D. et al. Global Transformations. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999. (In Engl.) 19. Martinez, O. J. Border People. Life and Society in the U. S. Mexico borderlands. Tucson, London: University of Arizona Press, 1994. (In Engl.) 20. Perkman, M. Cross-Border Regions in Europe. Significance and Drivers of Regional Cross-Border Cooperation. European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 10, no. 2, pp.153–171, 2003. (In Engl.) 21. Smith, A. D. National Identity. London: Penguin Books, 1991. (In Engl.) |
| Full article | Socio-philosophical Analysis of Ethnocultural Diversity |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
