| Annotation |
The absence of ideology, the dominance of the materialistic worldview ‒ all this orients man not for the common good, not for self-knowledge and development, but for more tangible things: food, safety, pleasure, accommodation. It is difficult to achieve socio-economic development in a society that does not care about the day ahead. If we want development, then we need to raise the value level of consciousness, develop thinking, giving it an uplifting ideological, semantic and debatable space. Such a space, in principle, can be given by different spheres of culture and scientific disciplines, but the main role in the development of the mentality of Russians should belong to philosophy as a treasure of humankind, regular rethinking of which makes us smarter and better. But modern philosophical and other types of thinking are still far from ideal. Therefore, we must: a) recognize the mental obstacles that leave society in the space of negative thoughts and emotions; b) propose ideas and methods that bring people from the low-resource state of apathy and mutual alienation to the high-resource state of creativity, cooperation, “self-projecting of civic identity” (Yu. A. Gorbunova, L. I. Zabara), etc.); c) put the study of philosophy, especially the ethical-political-legal part of it at a serious institutional level; d) rebuild the educational system in accordance with the holistic ideas about the person and society, so that it can create the human and social capital necessary for the development of the country. |
| References |
1.
Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. M: AST, 2015. (In Rus.)
2.
Berdyaev, N. The fate of Russia. M: Philosophical Society of the USSR, 1990. (In Rus.)
3.
Voltaire. Philosophical writings. M: Nauka, 1988. (In Rus.)
4.
Il’inskiy, I. M. «Modernization» of Russian education in the context of globalization. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, no. 3, pp. 3–23, 2012. (In Rus.)
5.
Inglehart, R., Welzel, C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy The Human Development Sequence. M: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2011. (In Rus.)
6.
Gorbunova, Yu. A., Zabara, L. I. Auto-designing of civic identity in the light of new anthropology. Humanitarian vector, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 6–14, 2017. (In Rus.)
7.
Capra, F. Dao of Physics: Exploration of the Parallels Between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism. M: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2017. (In Rus.)
8.
Marx, K. A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Writings. M: State edition of polit. lit., 1955. V. 1: 414–429. (In Rus.)
9.
Marx, K. Feybach Abstracts. K. Marx and F. Engels. Writings. M: State edition of polit. lit., 1955. V. 3: 1–6. (In Rus.)
10.
Materialists of ancient Greece. M: Gos. izd-vo polit. lit., 1955. (In Rus.)
11.
Shestov, L. Lectures po istorii grecheskoi philosophii. M., Paris: Tretij put, YMCA-PRESS, 2001. (In Rus.)
12.
Franfl, V. Man’s Search for Meaning. М: Progress, 1990. (In Rus.)
13.
Yung, K. G. Undisclosed self. Сhosen. Mn: Poppuri, 1998: 65–263. (In Rus.)
14.
Harman, G. Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 99, pp. 315–331, 1999. (In Engl.)
15.
Ignatieff, M. The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. Princeton, 2004. (In Engl.)
16.
Keys, M. M. Aquinas, Aristotle, and the Promise of the Common Good Cambridge University Press, 2006. (In Engl.)
17.
Lakoff, G. Moral politics: how liberals and conservatives think. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 1996, 2002. (In Engl.)
18.
Weber, E. T. Morality, Leadership, and Public Policy: On Experimentalism in Ethics. London, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011. (In Engl.) |
