| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Critical Analysis of Classical Concepts of Understanding of the Term «Value» |
| Authors | Suslin R.A. Postgraduate Student, klimenko_tk@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | PHILOSOPHY |
| UDK | 17 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article is devoted to the search of the alternative determination of the concept «value». An attempt is made to solve an age-old problem concerned with the so-called «amorphousness» (indefiniteness, uncertainty) of the concept «value» in a way that does not negatively impact on its empirical nature. This attempt is made on the basis of the critical analysis of fundamental definitions of values. Implementation of synergy of natural and phenomenological directions of the fundamental axiology according to the personified approach is suggested as a solution of this problem. According to this approach a holder of values is provided with a definite set of values. The main category of Kant value system «duty» related to unselfishness in this work is seen as a connecting link between natural and phenomenological paradigms. The article suggests the main definitions of the concept «value» given by classical and post-classical axiologists, representatives of utilitarian, hedonistic, transcendental, behavioral, hedonistic-psychoanalytical and some other branches of axiology. The structuring of definitions was made upon formal (explicit and implicit definitions) and content-related (explicit and maximum or supreme definitions) criteria. Their characteristic features are given. Definitions described by means of different aspects of value, the socalled «internal» definitions and definitions of «vicious circle» are singled out as separate categories.As a result of the analysis general drawbacks are defined which can be considered as the reason of «crisis» of classic axiology, and their correction formed the basis for the development of the alternative determination of the concept «value». |
| Key words | value, concept, definition, naturalism, phenomenologism, personalism, universalism, unselfishness, significance |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Vegas H. M. Cennosti i vospitanie. Kritika nravstvennogo reljativizma. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta; Izd-vo Rus. hrist. gumanit. akad., 2007. 225 c. 2. Geffding G. Filosofija religii. SPb.: Obshhestvennaja pol’za, 1912. 217 s. 3. Efimov V.I., Talanov V.M. Obshhechelovecheskie cennosti. M.: Akademija Estestvoznanija. 2010. URL: http://www. monographies.ru/97 (data obrashcheniya: 23.03.2014). 4. Kagan M.S. Filosofskaja teorija cennosti. SPb.: Petropolis, 1997. 205 c. 5. Kant I. Sochinenija na nemeckom i russkom jazykah. M.: Moskovskij filosofskij fond, 1997. 248 c. 6. Maslou A. Motivacija i lichnost’. SPb: Evrazija, 1999. 230 s. 7. Ribo T. Logika chuvstv. SPb.: Izd. O. N. Popovoj, 1905. 145 s. 8. Rikkert G. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul’ture. M.: Respublika, 1998. 193 s. 9. Rozov N.S. Cennosti v problemnom mire: filosofskie osnovanija i social’nye prilozhenija konstruktivnoj aksiologii. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo Novosibirskogo un-ta. 1998. URL: http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/ f00/s01/z0001097/st000.shtml (data obrashhenija 28.04.2014). 10. Fresko Zhak. Dokumental’nyj fil’m «Raj ili zabvenie» // Ponimanie cennostej. Sistema cennostej. URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wrrrkku9WM (data obrashhenija 14.01.2014). 11. Shohin V. K. Filosofija cennostej i rannjaja aksiologicheskaja mysl’: мonografija. M.: RUDN. 2006. 457 c. 12. Edel A. Value. Theory of // Encyclopedia of Ethics. Ed. L. S. Becker, C. B. Becker: 1992. Vol. 2. 2139 r. 13. Ethics education in the military / edited by Paul Robinson, Nigel de Lee and Don Carrick. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited Gower House Croft Road Aldershot Hampshire GU11 3HR. 2008. 208 r. 14. Kirchner / Kirchners Worterbuch der Philosophischen Grundbegrifie: Hdlb, 1911. 1095 r. 15. Laird J. A Study in Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. 1920. 167 r. 16. Pepper St. S. The Sources of Value. Berkeley – Los Angeles, 1958. 203 r. 17. Philosophical Review, 1922, Vol. XXXI / Doring A. Philosophische Guterlehre. 1888. 897 r. 18. Philosophy, 1917, Vol. XIV Wieser / Wieser J. Uber der Ursprung und der Hauptgeschichte der wirtschaftlichen Wert. 1884. 1209 r. |
| Full article | Critical Analysis of Classical Concepts of Understanding of the Term «Value» |
| 0 | |
| 6 | |
