| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Construct and Gestalt as Modern Means of Human Science |
| Authors | Bocharnikov V.N. Doctor of Biology, Professor, vbocharnikov@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | Humanitarian Geography |
| UDK | 009:140.8:159.937 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | A significant part of modern person’s everyday life, his work, leisure time, personal contacts occur within information space. We should note that the foundation for understanding changes in different era, and understanding person cannot be free from various backgrounds; he investigates not an abstract subject, but the concrete person who share the stereotypes of the time, having his view of the world. The information we received from the external world is various, it is coded that the received signals by persons’ senses in collapsed linear form contain multidimensional characteristics. Constructivist beliefs, saying that relevant reality is actively constructed by us and should include the idea that design is colored by what appears to be the most important, and this is the essence of the process or phenomenon of psychological sphere, functioning as the main format of the social interaction of the subject with the world. This also means that the world consists of organized forms, and perception of the world also organized and is perceived as something whole organized (Gestalt). Science is a tool for implementing the people’s interests, and to have its provisions in force, it is necessary to believe in its efficiency. National reflection of fundamental understanding of modernity denies the possibility of obtaining objective knowledge, even using the most modern scientific methods, and only formally recognizes the importance and necessity of scientific way of knowing, where man is able to create his own world and culture. |
| Key words | scientific cognition, perception, gestalt, construct, humanities |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Bocharnikov V. N. Fenomen geshtal’ta v paradigme sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi geografii // Astrakhanskii vestnik ekologicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2012. № 3. S. 54–63. 2. Bocharnikov V. N. Geograficheskoe poznanie i individualizm, vospriyatie i issledovatel’skii obraz – vazhnye voprosy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi geografii // Geograficheskii vestnik. 2013. № 2. S. 14–24. 3. Bocharnikov V. N. Konstrukt i geshtal’t v geografii vospriyatiya cheloveka // Regional’nye issledovaniya. 2013. № 2. S. 4–11. 4. Vyzovy XXI veka: priroda, obshchestvo, prostranstvo. Otvet geografov stran SNG. M.: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdanii KMK. 2012. 337 s. 5. Golubchenko I. V. Istoriya i sovremennye problemy geograficheskogo izucheniya organizovannosti ob”ektov. Evolyutsiya obshchestvenno-geograficheskoi mysli: materialy mezhd. nauchn. konf. (Tret’ya ezhegodnaya nauchnaya Assambleya ARGO) / pod red. A. G. Druzhinina i A. I. Chistobaeva. SPb.;- Rostov n/D. 2012. S. 68–75. 6. Zamyatin D. N. Kul’tura i prostranstvo. Modelirovanie geograficheskikh obrazov: http:// www.modernlib.ru/books/dmitriy_nikolaevich_zamyatin/kultura_i_prostranstvo_ modelirovanie_geograficheskih_obrazov/read_1/ (data obrashcheniya 17.02.2013). 7. Kokhanovskii, V. P. Filosofiya: uch. posobie dlya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. URL: http://modernlib.ru/books/kohanovskiy_valeriy/filosofiya_uchebnoe_posobie/ read_1/ (data obrashcheniya 17.03.2014). 8. Mangasaryan V. N. Osnovaniya koevolyutsii prirody i obshchestva: filosofskometodologicheskii analiz: avtoref. d-ra filos. nauk. SPb. 2011. 46 s. 9. Melik-Gaikazyan I. V. Vozdeistvie menyayushchegosya mira kak informatsionnyi protsess // Chelovek. 2011. № 3. S. 32–43. 10. Mokhovikov A. Ot redaktora: Geshtal’t pod sen’yu poststrukturalizma i dekonstruktsii / G. Uiler. Geshtal’terapiya postmoderna: za predelami individualizma. M.: Smysl. 2011. S. 5–9. 11. Ogurtsov A. P. Nauka i filosofiya nauki v sovremennom obshchestve // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2008. № 5. S. 150–163. 12. Orlova V. E. Kul’turnoe prostranstvo: opredelenie, spetsifika, struktura: URL: http://www.analiculturolog.ru/archive/item/589-cultural-spacestructure-determination-ofspecificity. html (data obrashcheniya 14.01.2012). 13. Pautova L. A. Kompleksnyi podkhod k issledovaniyu sotsial’nogo predstavleniya o stabil’nosti // Sotsiologiya: 4M. 2004. S. 32–65. 14. Petrenko V. F. Paradigma konstuktivizma v gumanitarnykh naukakh // Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2010. T. 5. Vyp. 3. S. 5–12. 15. Tronina L. A. Ekologicheskaya orientatsiya soznaniya kak faktor sovremennogo mirovozzreniya: avtoref. dis…. d-ra filos. nauk. M. 2009. 24 s. 16. Uiller G. Geshtal’terapiya postmoderna: za predelami individualizma. M.: Smysl, 2011. 464 s. 17. Chernosvitov P.Yu. Evolyutsiya zhizni kak informatsionnyi protsess // Chelovek. 2006. № 3. S. 5–20. 18. Yudin B. G. Chelovek kak ob”ekt tekhnologicheskikh vozdeistvii // Chelovek. 2011. № 3. S. 5–20. |
| Full article | Construct and Gestalt as Modern Means of Human Science |
| 0 | |
| 11 | |
