| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Philosophical Marking of the Professionally Important Object in a Complex Interdisciplinary Research |
| Authors | Khudyakova N.L. Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, hudyakovanl@gmail.comKhairulin S.S. Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, hairulin58@mail.ruMatsyna A.I. Candidate of Philosophy, matsyna@inbox.ruPolyakova O.O. Doctoral Candidate, oleniya@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | Problems of philosophy of science and education |
| UDK | 165 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article describes the studying of philosophical knowledge in university by military cadets – future navigators, as the universal basis of reflection which allows them to perceive the world as a unity in diversity. Integrated interdisciplinary research of the celestial sphere as a professionally meaningful object is organized on the basis of synthesis of philosophy, aviation. astronomy, and archaeoastronomy. The development of the students’ ability to philosophical reflection allows them to understand a person in whole and themselves in particular as fundamentally objective creatures. This changes their perception of reality. Philosophy becomes a general methodological “axis” of the general scientific and specialized training of the flight personnel. The results make it possible to reach a higher level of philosophical generalization. This approach allows us to have a positive influence on professional skills formation and education of the full-fledged personality, to form the basis for further philosophy comprehension. |
| Key words | teaching philosophy, cultural markings, coelosphere, аrchaeoastronomy, aviation astronomy, celestial spherical coordinates, navigator |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Lyalin A. Ya. Osnovy aviatsionnoy astronomii: metod. rek. Chelyabinsk: ChVAISh, 2002. 22 s. 2. Matsyna A. I., Slizky V. Utrachenny mifologichesky kontekst i nashi znaniya o proshlom // Gorizonty tsivilizatsii: materialy Tretyikh arkaimskikh chteny (Arkaim, 22–25 maya 2012 g.) / pod red. d-ra filol. nauk, prof. M. V. Zagidullinoy. Chelyabinsk, 2012. 350 s. 3. Matsyna A. I. Chuyev N. I., Kasyanov A. V., Berdnikov D. D. Gipotetiko-deduktivny put poiska svidetelstv drevney ritualnoy deyatelnosti // Smysly, tsennosti, normy v bytii cheloveka, obshchestva i gosudarstva. Vtoraya region. nauch. konf. Chelyabinsky gos. un-t. 30 maya 2010 goda. Chelyabinsk, 2010. S. 143–146. 5. Nevelev A. B. Bytiye cheloveka: dialektika predmetnosti i energynosti. // Vestnik ChelGU. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Kulturologiya». Vyp. 24. № 15 (269). 2012. S. 30–35. 6. Polyakova O. O. Tipy astronomicheskikh planirovok v arkheologicheskikh pamyatnikakh. Chelyabinsk, 2003. 25 s. 7. Polyakova O O. Arkheoastronomiya v zerkale evolyutsionnogo poznaniya. M., 2007. 160 s. 8. Chuyev N. I., Kitov E. P., Borisov D. V., Kharitonov A. V. Primeneniye GIS «Karta 2005» v arkheologicheskikh issledovaniyakh // Geoprofi: nauch.-tekhn. zhur. po geodezii, kartografii i navigatsii. M., 2006. № 2. S. 50–53. URL: http://www.geoprofi.ru/technology/Article_2305_10.htm (data obrashcheniya: 30.04.2013). 9. Matsyna A., Poiyakova O. Human Cognition in the Light of Astronomical Categories // Cosmology Across Cultures. USA, San Francisco, 2009. P. 481–486. |
| Full article | Philosophical Marking of the Professionally Important Object in a Complex Interdisciplinary Research |
| 0 | |
| 2 | |
