| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Ontology and Epistemology of Complexity |
| Authors | Chernikova I.V. Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, chernic@mail.tsu.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | Problems of philosophy of science and education |
| UDK | 165.12 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | Phenomenon of complexity in ontological and gnoseological aspects is in the focus of the paper. In the ontological aspect complexity appears as self-developing systems mode of being. The parameters of complexity, modes of organization and interaction of elements in complex systems are revealed and analyzed. The interpretation of complexity generated by cognition and based on cognitive interaction between the subject and environment is not less important. This kind of complexity is generated by a reflexive-communicating subject, who perceives himself not only as a participant of the world evolution, but also as a constructor of this world by means of his projective-constructive activity. The cognitive aspect of complexity is revealed with the special kind of reality reflection – complex thinking. The integration of these approaches is crystalized in the complexity paradigm. On the level of complexity paradigm, the interpretation of both reality and a line of action changes and, as a result, it transforms the reality itself. |
| Key words | subject, object, self-developing system, complexity, nonlinearity, cognition, complex thinking |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Arshinov V. I. Konvergiruyushchiye tekhnologii v perspektive budushchego cheloveka // Chelovek i ego budushcheye: novye tekhnologii i vozmozhnosti cheloveka. M.: LENAND, 2012. S. 262–273. 2. Dzolo D. Demokratiya i slozhnost. Realistichesky podkhod. M.: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2010. 318 s. 3. Knyazeva Ye. N. Udivitelny mir nelineynosti i slozhnosti // Neizbezhnost nelineynogo mira. M.: Gumanitary, 2012. S. 73–96. 4. Latypov N. N. Beylin V. A. Vereshkov G. M. Vakuum, elementarnye chastitsy i vselennaya. M.: MGU, 2001. 232 s. 5. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya: biologicheskiye korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001. 224 s. 6. Mayntser K. Slozhnost i samoorganizatsiya // Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. S. 61–74. 7. Moren E. Metod. Priroda Prirody. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2005. 464 s. 8. Saymon G. Struktura slozhnosti v razvivayushchemsya mire // Kompyutery, mozg, poznaniye: uspekhi kognitivnykh nauk. M.: Nauka, 2008. S. 21–28. 9. Khaken G. Printsipy raboty golovnogo mozga. Sinergetichesky podkhod k aktivnosti mozga, povedeniyu i kognitivnoy deyatelnosti. M.: PERSE, 2001. 352 s. 10. Khaken G. Informatsiya i samoorganizatsiya. Makroskopichesky podkhod k slozhnym yavleniyam. M.: Mir, 1994. 240 s. 11. Chernikova I. V., Chernikova D. V. Slozhnost kak sposob bytiya samorazvivayushchikhsya sistem // Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2011. S. 196–208. 12. Chernikova I. V., Chernikova D. V. Kognitivnye aspekty slozhnosti // Vestnik TGU. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2012. № 4. Vyp. 1. S. 91–98. 13. Chernikova I. V. Globalny evolyutsionizm (filosofsko-metodologichesky analiz). Tomsk.: Izd-vo TGU, 1987. 187 s. 14. Castellani B., Yafferty F. Sociology and complexity. A New field inquiry. Berlin: Springer, 2009. P. 2. |
| Full article | Ontology and Epistemology of Complexity |
| 0 | |
| 5 | |
