Article
Article name	To the Issue of Visualization of a Historical Narrative
Authors	Chistanov M.N. Doctor of Philosophy , Associate Professor, maratchistanov@gmail.com
Bibliographic description	Chistanov M. N. To the Issue of Visualization of a Historical Narrative // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 3. PP. 121–127. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-3-121-127.
Section	PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY
UDK	930.1: 130.2
DOI	10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-3-121-127
Article type
Annotation	In article is considered as the historical discourse changes upon transition from a traditional historical narrative to a visual narrative. The impossibility of application of methodology of a verification to historic facts forces researchers to address problems of the analysis of the whole historical texts. In this case, the special type of logical value is attributed to the text or a narrative: it can be true or false only entirely. This feature allows us to speak about the special informative procedure which coordinates with the trust caused by a narrator or a narrative in the reader or the listener. Crisis of historical science in the twentieth century leads to two fundamental shifts: to loss of belief in objectivity of historians and disappearance of a historical event. These shifts lead to the fact that a large number of people satisfies the need for history with own forces. They include themselves in the system of the visual and sensual symbols giving feeling of participation and at the same time allowing to be protected from manipulations. Widely discussed “visualization” of a historical narrative reflects transformation of modern historical consciousness of the ordinary person in the conditions of permanent crisis of professional historical science.
Key words	historical consciousness, historical narrative, pragmatical turn, post-linguistic analysis, visualization
Article information
References	1. Ankersmit, F. R., Sublime Historical experience. Moscow: Europe, 2007. (In Rus.) 2. Ankersmit, F. R. History and tropology. The rise and fall of metaphor. M: Progress-Tradition, 2003. (In Rus.) 3. Govorunov, A. V., Matrix and through it. Collective monograph review “MediaPhilosophy XII. Game or reality? Research experience in the study of computer games”. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, pp. 196–203, no. 1, 2019. DOI: 0.23951/2312-7899-2019-1-196-203 (In Rus.) 4. Inishev, I. N., Biedash, Y. A. The visual, social, and imaginative: Visual perception as a factor of contemporary culture. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. no. 1, pp. 9–25, 2016. (In Rus.) 5. Ionov, I. N. Civilizational Consciousness and Historical Knowledge: Interaction Problems. M: Nauka, 2007. (In Rus.) 6. Ionov, I. N. World history in the Global Age: New historical consciousness. M: Aquilo, 2015. (In Rus.) 7. Krasilnikova, E. I. Commemoration of the confrontation: the construction of memory’s loci about The Civil War in the Cities of Siberia. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, pp. 57–75, no. 3, 2018. DOI: 10.23951/2312-899-2018-3-57-75 (In Rus.) 8. Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. The Ignoramus Paradox: The time of visual symbolism domination. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, no. 4, pp. 49–64, 2017. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2017-4-49-64 (In Rus.) 9. Repina, L. P. Historical Science at the Turn of the 20th and 21st Centuries: Social Theories and Historiographic Practice. M: 2011. (In Rus.) 10. Ricoeur Paul. Memory, history, forgetting. M: 2004. (In Rus.) 11. Rorty Richard McKay. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Novosibirsk, 1997. (In Rus.) 12. Smirnov, S. A. Visual journey as a method. Genesis. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 2017. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2017-1-9-26(In Rus.) 13. Syrov, V. N. Introduction to Philosophy of History: Features of the Historical Thought. M: 2006. (In Rus.) 14. Syrov, V. N. What historical narrative should be like? Narratorium. Interdisciplinary Journal, no. 2, 2012. Web: 20.04.2019 http://narratorium.rggu.ru/article.html?id=2628915 (In Rus.) 15. El’darion, A. A. Historical narrative as a communicative event. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, pp. 210–214, no. 12, part 2, 2017. (In Rus.) 16. El’darion, A. A. “Narrative turn” in modern Philosophy of History: Problems and Prospects. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, pp. 209–212, part 2, no. 3, 2017. (In Rus.) 17. Leskanich Alexandre. In history’s wake: a dialogue with Martin L. Davies. Rethinking History. The Journal of Theory and Practice, pp. 558–580, no 4, vol. 22, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/13642529.2018.1507879 (In Engl.) 18. Tamm Marek, Zeleňák Eugen. In a Parallel World: An Introduction to Frank Ankersmit’s Philosophy of History. Journal of the philosophy of history, pp. 325–344, vol. 12, 2018. DOI:10.1163/18722636-12341401 (In Engl.)
Full article	To the Issue of Visualization of a Historical Narrative
	0
	28