| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Buddhist Systematic Text as an Example of Logic Totality |
| Authors | Bazarov A.A. Doctor of Philosophy, Senior Researcher, bazarow_andr@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | PROBLEMS OF HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY |
| UDK | 294.321 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | This article focuses on the little-studied in modern science fact of formal logic totality in philosophical treatises of the Tibet-Mongolian Buddhism. Logic totality appears in the structure of the Buddhist text (categories), as well as in its content (scholastic debate examples). The first part of the paper is devoted to the problem of presenting philosophical categories. Examples are taken from the text “The Source of Sages” (dag yig mkhas pa\'i \'byung gnas) as the most specific text that demonstrates this aspect of Buddhist philosophical literature. The second part of the article is devoted to studying the problems of comparative analysis of philosophical categories in Buddhist texts. The study is based on the samples from the philosophical literature of the bsdus grwa genre. |
| Key words | Buddhism, Buddhist text, logic totality, philosophical debate |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Bazarov A. A. Institut filosofskogo disputa v tibetskom buddizme. SPb., 1998. 184 s. 2. Vanchikova C. P. Istorija burjatskogo buddizma. Pis’mennye istochniki: transliteracija, perevod, kommentarij i issledovanie. Ulan-Udje: Izd-vo BNC SO RAN, 2006. 147. s. 3. Dandaron B. D., Semichov B. V. O tibetsko-mongol’skom slovare «Istochnik mudrecov» // Trudy BKNII SO AN SSSR. Vyp. 3. Serija vostokovedenija. Ulan-Udje, 1960. S. 58–68. 4. Istochnik mudrecov: tibetsko-mongol’skij terminologicheskij slovar’ buddizma (Paramita i Madh’jamika). Ulan-Udje, 1968. S. 213–234. 5. Rudoj V. I. K rekonstrukcii matrik (chislovyh spiskov) Abhidharmy //Istorija i kul’tura Central’noj Azii. M., 1983. S. 73–92. 6. Svetlov V. A. Prakticheskaja logika. SPb.: RGHI, 1995. 486 s. 7. Werbatskoj F. I. Izbrannye trudy po buddizmu. M.: GRVL, 1988. 428 s. 8. DYKBN Dag yig mkhas pa’i ‘byung gnas zhes bya ba las gtan tshigs rig pa’i skor bzhugs so // Dag yig mkhas pa’i ‘byung gnas zhes bya ba. Tom Ja pa, ll. 1A-18A. Pekinskij ksilograf tibetskogo fonda IMBiT SO RAN. № TT-11994(4). 9. KNJG Sakya-pandit. Mkhas pa rnams ‘jug pa’i sgo zhes bya ba’i bstan pa chos bzhugs so // Sa-skya bka’-‘bum. Tom Tha pa., ll.163A-224A. Djergjeskij ksilograf tibetskogo fonda SPbF IV RAN. № V 7544/5. 10. Gokhale P. Pradeep. Vadanyaya of Dharmakirti: The Logic of Debate. Shakti Nagar, Delhi. 1993. 11. Inami M., Tillemans T. J. F. Another look at the framework of the Pramāasiddhi chapter of Pramānavārttika // Wiener Zeitschrift for die Kunde Südasiens und Archiv für Indische Philosophie. Band XXX, Leiden-Küln, Wien, 1986. 12. Onoda Shunzo. Monastic Debate in Tibet.A study on the history and structure of bsdus grwa logic. - Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde. Heft 27. Wien, 1992. 13. Perdue Daniel Elmo. Debate in Tibetan buddhism. N. Y.,1992. 14. Tillemans Tom. Formal and Semantic Aspects of Tibetan Buddhist Debate Logic.- Journal of Indian Philosophy, vol.17, no 3, 1989. 15. Tillemans T. Pramānavārttika IV (4). By Tillemans T. J. F. // Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens und Archiv für Indische Philosophie. Band XXXVII, Wien, 1993. 16. Wayman A. The Rules of Debate according to Asanga. Journal of the American Oriental Society. Vol.78. 1958. |
| Full article | Buddhist Systematic Text as an Example of Logic Totality |
| 0 | |
| 11 | |
