| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Key Characteristics of Argumentative and Suggestive Texts of Trial Rhetoric |
| Authors | Nikiforova E.S. , n. e. sh_1975@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | RUSSIAN PHILOLOGY |
| UDK | 811 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article deals with methods of realization of speech influence in the texts of trial rhetoric of Russian, Kazakh and English speaking authors. Comparative analysis showed that in all of them persuasion, suggestion, inducement are realized through text categories of argumentativeness and suggestivity, which is accounted for by similarity of communicative situation and social roles of communicants. Besides we revealed some specific features accounted for by tradition and mentality. So, Russian and Kazakh speaking authors due to the structure of their languages and mentality prefer accumulative and complex types of argumentation, whereas American lawyers resort to the composition of complex and compound ones. Argumentativeness is strengthened by suggestive resource in all the texts but in a different degree. American lawyers’ speeches are remarkable for modality, personality and tactics of direct address, which is aimed at establishing contact with the listeners, while Russian and Kazakhstani lawyers are reserved in expressing their opinion, try to follow the protocol, which is accounted for by the existing tradition and the structure of court in the countries in question. |
| Key words | argumentativeness, suggestivity, impersonality, modality, personal involvement, implication |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Bogacheva M. V. Specifika kompozicionnogo, logicheskogo i sintaksicheskogo oformlenija argumentativnyh tekstov. Dnepropetrovskij nacional\'nyj universitet, 2009. URL : http://www.nbuv. gov.ua/portal/Natural/Vdpu/Movozh/2009.../3.pdf (data obrashchenija : 02.01.2012). 2. Nefedova L. A. , Kim G. A. Rol\' implicitnoj informacii v argumentativnom diskurse ob-lasti «marketing»// Vestnik ChelGU.2011. №3 (248). S. 98–100. 3. Ostin Dzh. Slovo kak dejstvie // Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. 17. Teorija rechevyh aktov. M., 1986. S. 22–31. 4. Rechi sovetskih advokatov / sost: I.Ju.Suharev. M : Jurid. Lit, 1968. 170 s. 5. Samarina I. V. Kommunikativnye strategii» sozdanie kruga chuzhih» i «sozdanie kruga svo-ih» v politicheskoj kommunikacii : dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Rostov n/D : Izd-vo RGPU, 2006. 158 s. 6. Serl\' Dzh. Chto takoe rechevoj akt? // Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. 17. Teorija re-chevyh aktov. M. : Progress, 1989. S. 151–169. 7. Shelestjuk E. V. Rechevoe vozdejstvie: ontologija i metodologija issledovanija : dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Cheljabinsk : Izd-vo ChelGU, 2009. 303 s. 8. Toulmin, Stephen E. The Uses of Argument. Updated Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2003. 241 p. Istochniki 9. Ivakina N. N. Osnovy sudebnogo krasnorechija (ritorika dlja juristov) : ucheb. posobie. 2-e izdanie. URL : http://www.alleng.ru/d/jur/jur588htm (data obrashchenija : 09.01.2012). 10. Protokol sudebnogo zasedanija Kostanajskogo gorodskogo suda po delu N. A. Zhokeshbaja, osuzhdjonnogo po stat\'e 179 UK.RK. chast\' 2 ot 19.07.2011. 11. Excerpts from prosecutor Marcia Clark’s closing arguments Sept. 26, 1995, in the O. J. Simpson murder case. URL : http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/nns28.htm (data obrashchenija : 09.01.2012). 12. Larry Bowoto V. Chevron Corporation – Ninth Circuit. URL : http://www.ca9. uscourts.gov/.../09–156411.pdf. (data obrashchenija : 09.01.2012). |
| Full article | Key Characteristics of Argumentative and Suggestive Texts of Trial Rhetoric |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
