| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Screen Chronicle as an Element of Fake Journalism |
| Authors | Il’chenko S.N.Doctor of Philology tv_and_radio@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Il’chenko S. N. Screen Chronicle as an Element of Fake Journalism // Humanitarian Vector. Series History. Political Science. 2016. Vol. 11, No 4. P. 124–127. DOI: 10.21209/2307-1842-2016-11-4-1204-127 |
| Section | |
| DOI | 10.21209/2307-1842-2016-11-4-124-127 |
| UDK | 070 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article considers the problem of using film and video footage in modern journalistic practice. It analyzes mainly the materials devoted to various historical periods and events connected with the history of Russia. It identifies obvious discrepancies between visual and accompanying text. The author comes to the conclusion that in most cases these frames are on-screen fakes. They reflect the essence of the phenomenon of modern information culture as show civilization when dominant for a mass audience is the visual channel of the release of any information. More information is associated with specific historical eras. The development of technical means of mass communication in the twentieth century has resulted in a clear priority of video over all others. The reason for this, according to the author, lies in a priori trust of the audience to the film documents. Whereas in reality attracted film and video footage does not correspond to any chronological or meaningful events of the past that it was designed to illustrate. The article explains the reasons for this inadequate use of fragments and historical frames of newsreels. |
| Key words | newsreels, video, screen fakes, historical journalism, credibility, mass media, show civilization |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Bart R. Tretij smysl. M.: Ad Marginem, 2015. 104 s. 2. Bogomolov Ju. A. Zatjanuvsheesja proshhanie: Rossijskoe kino i televidenie v menjajushhemsja mire. M.: MIK, 2006. 320 c. 3. Bodrijjar Zh. Duh terrorizma. Vojny v zalive ne bylo / per. s fr. A. Kachalova. M.: RIPOL klassik, 2016. 224 s. 4. Vulf Virdzhinija. Kinematograf. M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2014. 80 s. 5. Il’chenko S. N. Shou-civilizacija: konec real’nosti? SPb.: IVJeSJeP, 2014. 198 s. 6. Il’chenko S. N. Pervaja mirovaja vojna na rossijskom telejekrane: illjuzija dostovernosti? // Vek informacii. Zhurnalistika i vojny: k 100-letiju Pervoj mirovoj vojny: materialy 53-j Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. «Sredstva massovoj informacii v sovremennom mire. Peterburgskie chtenija». S.-Peterb. gos. un-t, 23–25 apr. 2014 g. / redkol.: L. P. Gromova (otv. red.), G. V. Zhirkov, O. S. Kruglikova. SPb.: Vyssh. shk. zhurn. i mas. kommunikacij, 2015. 274 s. 7. Leklezio Zh. M. G. Smotret’ kino / predisl. Zh. Zhakoba; per. s fr., poslesl. D. Savosina. M.: Tekst, 2012. 173 s. 8. Pavlov A. Postydnoe udovol’stvie: filosofskie i social’no-politicheskie interpretacii massovogo kinematografa. M.: Izd. Dom Vyssh. shk. jekon., 2014. 360 s. 9. Sontag S’juzen. Protiv interpretacii i drugie jesse. M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2014. 352 s. 10. Tjurin Ju. P. Istorija i kinomistifikacii: kino, pravda, istorii, duhovnye tradicii. M.: NII kinoiskusstva, 2008. 296 s. |
| Full article | Screen Chronicle as an Element of Fake Journalism |
