| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Applied Methodology as a Problem of Domestic Historiography of the 18th-19th Centuries (Statement of the Problem) |
| Authors | Madzharov A.S.Doctor of History, Professor mas@home.isu.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Madzharov A. S. Applied Methodology as a Problem of Domestic Historiography of the 18th-19th Centuries (Statement of the Problem) // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 6. PP. 57–63. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-6-57-63. |
| Section | |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-6-57-63 |
| UDK | 930.1 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article is about the applied methodology, the method of the historian as a system in the structure of the history of historical science (historiography). The subject field of historiography, the history of historical science, includes the study of its own theoretical and methodological “constructions”: a theory and a method. However, there is no systematic history of applied methodology, special sections (paragraphs) revealing the method in the textbooks on domestic historiography crowning the process of historiographical research. The historiographical situation in the field of applied methodology worsened in the post-Marxist period in particular. This is due, in particular, to the lack of a direct statement of this problem in the history of historical science (historiography). Historians of historical science, philosophers M. A. Kukartseva, N. I. Smolensky, A. A. Chernobaev, A. B. Sokolov, as well as their predecessors N. L. Rubinstein, A. L. Shapiro and others agree that there is no single version of the methodology. However, this recognition is not enough. A systematic study of the methodological arsenal of historians, from V. N. Tatishchev to V. O. Klyuchevsky and others, is required based on a unified approach, considered within the framework of the history of historical science, a description of how the author’s method, school and direction originated, developed, contributed to the discovery of new facets of “history” and finally exhausted itself. We need special studies in correlation between the philosophical ideas of the classics of philosophy and methodology of the particular historian, influence of the value orientation of the historian on the form and content of the object of historical study, the selection of a set of core concepts used for the topic. The study of these elements of the internal form of history of historical science is urgent, for it translates the analysis of the evolution of the method from the empirical (content review) to the theoretical level ‒ the study of the structure, evolution, “mechanism” of applied methodology and opens the way to formalizing historical knowledge. |
| Key words | history of historical science (historiography), internal form of historical science, philosophy, methodology, applied methodology, direction, school |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Karamzin, N. M. History of the Russian state. In 4 part. Part 1. V. I. M: Book, 1988. (In Rus.) 2. Kukartseva, M. A. Transformation episteme: the knowledge of history in the elusive world. Instead of introduction. Methods of comprehension of the past: methodology and theory of historical science. M: «Canon+, ROOI “Rehabilitation”, 2011: 3–49. (In Rus.) 3. Madzharov, A. S. History of Russian historiography of XVIII–XIX centuries: S. M. Soloviev about V. N. Tatishcheva. History of historical science in Russia XVIII–XXI centuries Eleventh Shchapov readings. Proceedings of the all-Russian scientific conference. Irkutsk, Imprint, 2018: 21–38. (In Rus.) 4. Madzharov, A. S. Formation of the official doctrine of the religious schism of the Russian Orthodox Church in the works of V. N. Tatishchev. Proceedings of Irkutsk state University Series, pp. 67–77, vol. 27, 2019. (In Rus.) 5. Madzharov, A. S. Morality as a theory and method of «History of the Russian state» N. M. Karamzin. The Christian principle in the culture of Russia XIX ‒ XXI centuries. Seventh Shchapov readings. Irkutsk, 2008: 6–20. (In Rus.) 6. Madzharov, A. S. Afanasii prokopevich Shchapov: the history of life (1831–1876) and the life of “History”. Irkutsk: Publication of JSC “Irkutsk regional printing house № 1. V. M. Posokhina”, 2005. (In Rus.) 7. Madzharov, A. S. V. O. Klyuchevsky: the artistic beginning of the interdisciplinary method of historical research. Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University, pp. 37–46, no. 5, 2017. (In Rus.) 8. Madzharov, A. S. Ideas of centralism and federalism in the historiography of Russian history of the second half of the XIX century (applied methodology of historical research in the works of S. M. Solovyov and A. P. Schapov). Humanitarian vector, pp. 128–137, no. 3, 2019. (In Rus.) 9. Rubinstein, N. L. Russian historiography. Oh. SPb. Publishing house of St. Petersburg University, 2008. (In Rus.) 10. Soloviev, S. M. History of Russia since ancient times. Compositions. In 18 books. Book 1. M: Thought, 1988. (In Rus.) 11.Tatishchev, V. N. Russian History from the most ancient times. In 7 volumes. Vol. 1. M: Akad. project, 2016. (In Rus.) 12.Tatishchev, V. N Conversation TLD [x] friends about the benefits of science and schools. Selected works. L: Science, 1979. (In Rus.) 13. Shchapov, A. P. Zemsky Sobor in the seventeenth century. The Cathedral of 1642. Works. V.1. SPb: Publishing of M. V. Pirozhkova. 1906. (In Rus.) 14. Shchapov A. P. Zemstvo. Works. V. 1. SPb: Publishing of M. V. Pirozhkova, 1906. (In Rus.) 15. Shchapov, A. P. Rural community. Works. V. 1. SPb: Publishing of M. V. Pirozhkova, 1906. (In Rus.) |
| Full article | Applied Methodology as a Problem of Domestic Historiography of the 18th-19th Centuries (Statement of the Problem) |
