Article | |
---|---|
Article name | Symbolic Aspects of Nutrition Vocabulary in the Turkic Languages |
Authors | Znilkubaeva A.S.Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor dias_ ai50 @mail.ru |
Bibliographic description | Znilkubaeva A. Sh. Symbolic Aspects of Nutrition Vocabulary in the Turkic Languages // Humanitarian Vector. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 1. PP. 111–117. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-1-111-117. |
Section | |
DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-1-111-117 |
UDK | 811.512.1’ |
Article type | |
Annotation | The article uses a lot of factual material to reveal the role of ethnographisms associated with cooking during the most significant moments of human life: birth, wedding, burial. The connection of symbolism with ritual is revealed.The purpose of the article is based on the specifics of the work caused by the need for a linguoculturological description of the vocabulary of nutrition, the definition of extralinguistic factors (customs, traditions and religious beliefs) in the formation, development and functioning, as well as the disclosure of the symbolic essence of this LSH.The relevance of the article is determined by the need for linguistic and cultural understanding of the food vocabulary, which is widely reflected in paremia, concepts, phraseological units, and customs as the most stable lexical and semantic categories of the Turkic languages (more than 2 000 lexical and phraseological units).The material of the study was the vocabulary of nutrition of the Turkic languages. The main methods used in the work are descriptive, comparative, and interpretive.The reception and serving of food among the Turkic peoples and their reflection in customs and traditions are symbolic relations between people connected by social, gender, and age relations. For example, the symbolism of food associated with the birth of a child has its roots in the distant past of the Turkic people and means a sacrifice for the successful birth of a woman. These rituals include: preparing special meals to speed childbirth: Garissa (lit. Competition with the cauldron, where food is cooked), preparing special dishes: sut burysh, IIT mun, burial of the bones of a ram slaughtered for a woman in labor, gnawing the neck vertebrae of a ram without a knife, burning meat, etc. These traditions are a symbol of introducing the baby to a new life denoting the appearance of a new person. As a result of the analysis of this thematic group, it was revealed that traditional household rituals are the most stable basis of the ethnic spiritual culture of the Turkic peoples, many symbolic actions related to food are common, which once again confirms the hypothesis of genetic kinship of these peoples.The concept of linguoculturological research of customs and traditions as one of the current trends in linguistics opens up new aspects of the relationship and connection of language and spiritual culture, language and folk mentality, language and folk art. In the conceptual picture of the world and the national – cultural context, the question of the place and role of the studied LSH is very significant.The scientific novelty of the research consists in the linguistic and cultural understanding of one of the traditionally established and most stable lexical and semantic categories of the Turkic languages – the vocabulary of nutrition. Such studies in modern linguistics have not been sofer conducted. |
Key words | food vocabulary, symbols, ritual, linguoculturology, ethnographism, customs, traditions, conceptual picture of the world |
Article information | |
References | 1. Avakova, R. Phraseological semantics. Almaty: 2002. (In Kazakh) 2. Butanaev, V. Ya. Traditional culture and life of the Khakas. Abakan: Khakassia, 1996. (In Rus.) 3. Valikhanov,Sh. Collection of works: in 5 vols. Alma-ATA: Kazakh. Sov. encycl., 1984. (In Rus.) 4. Zhilkubaeva, A. S. Food vocabulary in the Turkic languages (linguistic and culturological aspect). Ust-Kamenogorsk, 2013.( In Kazakh) 5. Katran, D. Kazaktyk dasturli as-taqam madenieti. Almaty, 2002. ( In Kazakh) 6. Lotman, Yu. M. Conversations about Russian culture: Life and traditions of the Russian nobility. SPb: Art, 1994. (In Rus.) 7. Maslova, V. A. Lingvoculturology. M: Akademia, 2001. (In Rus.) 8. Nurmakhanov, A. Turki phraseology. Almaty: Gylym, 1998. (In Kazakh) 9. Potebnya, A. A. From notes on Russian grammar. M: The state publishing house of Ukraine, 1958. (In Rus.) 10. Snesarev, G. P. Relicts of pre-Muslim beliefs and rituals of the Uzbeks of Khorezm. M: Nauka, 1969. (In Rus.) 11. Stepanov, Yu. S. Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture. M: School “Language and Russian Culture”, 1997. (In Rus.) 12. Teliya, V. N. Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects. M: Languages of Russian culture, 1996. (In Rus.) 13.Traditional worldview of the Turks of Southern Siberia (Man and Society). Novosibirsk: Science, 1989. (In Rus.) 14. Turner, V. Symbol and ritual. M: Nauka. Eastern lit., 1983. (In Rus.) 15. Yudakhin, K. Kirghiz ‒ Russian dictionary. M: Sov. encycl., 1965. (In Rus.) 16. Jung, K. G. Archetype and symbol. M: Renaissance, 1991. (In Rus.) |
Full article | Symbolic Aspects of Nutrition Vocabulary in the Turkic Languages |