| Annotation |
The interaction of man, society with nature has always been one of the most complex and contradictory
topics in various fields of scientific knowledge. This interaction was constantly transformed, but one feature has
always remained unchanged – human life directly depends on the state of nature. The ecological situation that
has developed at present, despite its constant updating at the international, federal and regional levels, continues
to remain unresolved, the threat to human life continues to grow. In this regard, the scientific substantiation of
the creation of effective mechanisms and technologies of environmental policy that will contribute to overcoming
the environmental crisis becomes urgent. The authors define the main goal of the study as identifying the features
and effective mechanisms of modern environmental policy of Russia and China at the social, technological,
natural levels of interaction between nature and society. The methodological basis of the research includes: a
general theory of interaction between nature and society, which allows us to analyze the main directions and
mechanisms of overcoming the ecological crisis at the social, technological, natural levels of interaction between
nature and society; a comparative historical approach, which allowed us to consider the dynamics and features
of the development of environmental policy in Russia and China; a systematic approach that contributed to a
comprehensive analysis of the features of environmental policy, taking into account the socio-economic, political
factors of the development of countries. This article highlights the main directions, stages, effective mechanisms
of modern environmental policy in Russia and China at the social, technological, natural levels of interaction
between nature and society. We concluded that the effective mechanisms of environmental policy are those that
are associated with changes at the technological level of interaction between nature and society, associated with
green and ecological production, measures taken at the level of plagenous processes remain ineffective. The
research materials can be applied to study and identify ways to overcome the ecological crisis, the features of
modern modernization processes in Russia and China. |
| References |
1. Pugachev, A. V. Environmental policy at the present stage: content, goals and objectives. Caspian
region: politics, economics, culture, no. 2, pp. 81–85, 2009. (In Rus.)
2. Kobylyanskiy, V. A. Nature and society: specificity, unity, interaction. Krasnoyarsk, 1985. (In Rus.)
3. Kobylyanskiy, V. A. Philosophy of ecology: basic concepts and problems of education. Baikal
psychological and pedagogical journal, no. 5–6, pp. 65–72, 2005. (In Rus.)
4. Stepin, V. S. Karl Marx and the tendencies of modern civilizational development. Karl Marx and
Contemporary Philosophy: Collection of Proceedings of the Scientific Conference dedicated to the 180th
anniversary of the birth of K. Marx (Moscow, April 23, 1998). M., 1999: 16–45. (In Rus.)
5. Girusov, E. V. Global problems of our time in their systemic unity and development. Philosophical
Sciences, no. 12, pp.18–24, 2012. (In Rus.)
6. Zakharova, E. Yu. Ecological culture of socionaturecosystems. Dr. philos. sci. diss. abstr. Chita, 2012.
(In Rus.)
7. Rendtorf, J. D. Ethics and responsibility of science and technology. In Philosophy in the Dialogue of
Cultures. M: Progress-Tradition, 2010: 804–812. (In Rus.)
8. Semiletova, E V. Environmental policy of Russia: a new stage. Russian political science, no. 3, pp. 6–11,
2017. (In Rus.)
9. Lenchuk, E. B. National projects in the goal-setting system of socio-economic development of Russia.
Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, no. 5, pp. 79–90, 2020. (In Rus.)
10. Goleva, R. V. Use of mineral resources and problems of sustainable development in Russia, no. 4,
pp.137–144, 2018. (In Rus.)
11. Gao Shan. Environmental Protection in China’s Economic Development – Dialectical Reflection on the
Topic “Gold and silver cannot be compared to a beautiful landscape”. Zhongguo guoji caijing (zhong yingwen),
no. 9, p. 274, 2018. (In Chinese)
12. Wang Jinnan, Dong Zhanfeng, Jiang Hongqiang, et al. Historical changes over 70 years and directions
of reforms in China’s strategic policy in the field of environmental protection. Huanjing kexue yanjiu, no. 10,
pp.1636–1644, 2019. (In Chinese)
13. Wang Qianjin, Wang Xiqun, Lu Shilei, et al. The economic theoretical foundation of ecological
compensation and China’s practice. Linye jingji, no. 1, pp. 4–24, 2019. (In Chinese)
14. Bal’chindorzhieva, O. B. Ecological civilization and post-modernization in China. Vestnik BGU, no. 14,
pp. 14–16, 2015. (In Rus.)
15. Bal’chindorzhieva, O. B. Ecological civilization of China: problems and development prospects. Vestnik
BGU, no. 2, pp. 81–85, 2017. (In Rus.)
16. Stalley, P. China’s climate progress may have faltered in 2018, but it seems to be on the right path,
2018. The conversation. Web. 16.02.2021. https://theconversation.com/chinas-climate-progress-may-havefaltered-
in-2018-but-it-seems-to-be-on-the-right-path-108589. (In Engl.)
17. Burmatova, O. P. Challenges in the formation of a favorable environmental situation in Russia and ways
to overcome them. Vestnik NGU, no. 2, pp. 19–34, 2017. (In Rus.)
18. Kranina, E. I. China’s 13th Five-Year Plan: turning toward “green economy”. Far East problems, no. 4,
pp. 69–77, 2017. (In Rus.) |
