Article
Article name Human Capital Concept Evolution in the Context of Scientific Knowledge Stages Dynamics
Authors Dedolko J.V.Master of Philosophy, Senior Lecturer dedolko@bsu.by
Bibliographic description Dedolko J. V. Human Capital Concept Evolution in the Context of Scientific Knowledge Stages Dynamics // Humanitarian Vector. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 5. PP. 8–17. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-5-8-17.
Section
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-5-8-17
UDK 101.1:3163+141.319.8
Article type
Annotation The article studies the human capital concept genesis and development in the context of philosophical and scientific knowledge dynamics. Society transformation to the post-industrial stage of social development led to the foundation of human capital theoretical conception. The relevance of the paper was dictated by the increasing human capital volume in the structure of modern social reproduction. The theoretical and methodological bases of the research are philosophical treatises of Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, T. Hobbes; political economy classics works by W. Petty, J. S. Mill, A. Smith, K. Marx; ideas analysis by F. Taylor, H. Ford, J. Minser, T. Schultz, G. Becker and others; articles by Russian and Belarusian economists like R. M. Nureev, Yu. V. Latov, R. I. Kapelyushnikov, M. M. Kovalev, E. G. Gospodarik. The empirical base is World Bank reports, human development reports of the UN. Analysis of literature revealed insufficient interest in human capital in the philosophical knowledge field, despite the fact that the concept related to axiological and existential aspects of human existence. The purpose of the paper was to perform philosophical and methodological research of the human capital concept, and identification of human capital status in post-industrial society resources structure. Historical and philosophical reconstruction methods, principles of systemic and transdisciplinary approaches were used to achieve the goal. The relationship between stages of social-economic society development and resources dematerialization was revealed. Four development stages of the human capital concept in the paradigm of science dynamics by V. S. Stepin were highlighted. The ambivalent status of the concept in scientific knowledge and public consciousness was substantiated. The significant resource potential of human capital at the post-industrial stage of society development was revealed.
Key words human capital, intangible resources, social reproduction, post-industrial society, dynamics of science
Article information
References 1. Aristotle. Politics. M: Ehksmo, 2015. (In Rus.) 2. Aquinas, Th. The sum of theology. V 9 t. T. 8. Chast’ 2.2. Voprosy 47–122. Kiev: Nika-Tsentr, 2013. (In Rus.) 3. Stepin, V. S. Classics, non-classical, post-non-classical: criteria for discrimination. In L. P. Kiyashchenko, V. S. Stepin editor Post-nonclassics: philosophy, science, culture. Ros. akad. nauk, SPb., 2009: 249–295. (In Rus.) 4. Stepin, V. S. Theoretical knowledge: structure, historical evolution. M: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. (In Rus.) 5. Hobbes, Th. Leviathan. M: Mysl’, 2001. (In Rus.) 6. Petti, W. Economic and statistical work. V. I i II. M: Sotsehkgiz, 1940. (In Rus.) 7. Smith, A. Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. M: Ehksmo, 2009. (In Rus.) 8. Rikardo, D. The beginnings of political economy and taxation. M: Ehksmo, 2016. (In Rus.) 9. Mill, J. S. Fundamentals of Political Economy. In 3 v. V. 1. M: Progress, 1980. (In Rus.) 10. Senior, N. W. Four introductory lectures on political economy, delivered before the University of Oxford. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1852. (In Engl.) 11. Marx, K. Capital. In 3 v. V. 1–2. M: Izdatel’stvo AST, 2001. (In Rus.) 12. Taylor, F. Principles of Scientific Management. M: Kontrolling, 1991. (In Rus.) 13. Ford, H. My life and my business. M: Kontseptual, 2019. (In Rus.) 14. Schumpeter, J. Economic development theory: a study of entrepreneurial profit, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. M: Progress, 1982. (In Rus.) 15. Fisher, A. G. B. Production, primary, secondary and tertiary. Economic Record, no. 1, pp. 24–38, 1939. (In Engl.) 16. Clark, C. The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: Macmillan, 1940. (In Engl.) 17. Fourastié, J. Le Grand Espoir du XXe siècle: Progrès technique, progrès économique, progrès social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1949. (In French) 18. Rostow, W. W. The Stages of Economic Growth. The Economic History Review, New Series, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1959. (In Engl.) 19. Bell, D. The coming post-industrial society. M: Academia, 2004. (In Rus.) 20. Nureev, R. M., Latov, YU. V. Human and social capital as the basis of a modern economy. Stage: economic theory, analysis, practice, no. 5, pp. 139–154, 2010. (In Rus.) 21. Pigou, A. C. The Economics of Welfare. 4 st ed. London: MacMillan and Co., Ltd. 1932. (In Engl.) 22. Pigou, A. C. A study in public finance. London: Macmillan. 1928. (In Engl.) 23. Lewis, W. A. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester: University of Manchester, 1954. Web. 18.03.2021. https://la.utexas.edu/users/hcleaver/368/368lewistable.pdf. (In Engl.) 24. Mincer, J. Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy, no. 4, pp. 281–302. 1958. (In Engl.) 25. Schultz, T. W. Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, vol. 51, pр. 1–17, 1961. (In Engl.) 26. Bekker, G. S. Human behavior. An economic approach. M.: Gos. un-t – Vyssh. shk. ehkonomiki, 2003. (In Rus.) 27. Kapelyushnikov, R. I. Gary Becker’s economic approach to human behavior. USA: economics, politics, ideology, no. 11, 1993. Web. 18.03.2021. http://www.libertarium.ru/68397 (In Rus.) 28. Mankiw, G. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107 (May), pp. 407–437, 1992. (In Engl.) 29. Denison, E. Study of differences in economic growth rates. M: Izdatel’stvo “Progress”, 1971. (In Rus.) 30. Nelson, R. R., Phelps, E. S. Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth. American Economic Review, no. 1/2, pp. 69–75, 1966. (In Engl.) 31. Arrow, K. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. Review of Economic Studies, no. 3, pp. 155–173, 1962. (In Engl.) 32. Kovalev, M. M., Gospodarik, E. G. Human capital is the foundation of the knowledge economy. Management problems, no 3, pp. 46–56, 2011. (In Rus.) 33. Barro, R. The economic growth. M: BINOM. Laboratoriya znanii, 2010. (In Rus.) 34. Haq, Mahbub ul. Reflections on human development: how the focus of development economics shifted from national income accounting to people-centred policies, told by one of the chief architects of the new paradigm / Mahbub ul Haq. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. XIX. (In Engl.) 35. Mahroum, S. Highly skilled globetrotters: mapping the international migration of human capital. R and D Management, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2000. (In Engl.) 36. Stewart, T. Intellectual capital. Ed. by V. L. Inozemtsev. New source of wealth for organizations. New post-industrial wave in the West. Anthology. M.: Academia, 1999: 372–400. (In Rus.) 37. Bourdieu, P. Forms of capital. Economic sociology, no. 5, pp. 60–74, 2002. (In Rus.) 38. Spence, M. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, no. 3, pp. 355–374, 1973. (In Engl.)
Full articleHuman Capital Concept Evolution in the Context of Scientific Knowledge Stages Dynamics