Article
Article name Modern Reading of the Sociology of Morality
Authors Polyushkevich O.A.Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor okwook@mail.ru
Bibliographic description Polyushkevich O. A. Modern Reading of the Sociology of Morality // Humanitarian Vector. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 5. PP. 50–58. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-5-50-58.
Section
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-5-50-58
UDK 316.32(075.8)
Article type
Annotation The paper analyzes theoretical concepts and empirical tools for the study of morality, altruism, contributing to the development of ideas, beliefs and values about justice or its absence and trust or distrust in oneself, people around and social institutions. The relevance of studying this issue has become especially acute during a pandemic, when questions of morality and ethics have become urgent for many people in everyday space with the daily choice of their own behavior, the safety of themselves and others during and after a pandemic. These research focuses are studied within the framework of an interdisciplinary approach to the sociology of morality. It is shown that the moral dimension of social reality is a key marker of social reproduction. This position is proved by the appeal of contemporaries within the framework of sociology, psychology, philosophy to these topics, as well as the author’s own empirical research conducted in 2019–2020 by filling out diaries for six months (165 people), where moral emotions arising in any life were recorded situations, the methodology of Sh. Schwartz was used to identify the basic values (survey of research participants) and focus group conversations (54 people), which made it possible to identify the discrepancy between the declared values and situational reactions to various interactions mediated by moral emotions. The article traces the influence of social interaction, produced through the influence of social institutions that develop group norms, on the behavior of individuals in certain situations of interaction and group reactions in the process of communication and subsequent assessments of this process. It is proved how moral emotions either strengthen the existing functioning of social institutions or destroy it, eroding the clear framework of what is proper, acceptable, and correct. It also shows how and why situational factors influence norms and values more than general ideas about moral norms. The article may be of interest to philosophers, sociologists and specialists in helping professions for fixing and reflecting on moral states and transformations of the modern social environment.
Key words trust, morality, altruism, values, solidarity, group identity
Article information
References 1. Abend, G. Two main problems in the sociology of morality. Theory a. society. Amsterdam, no. 2, pp. 87– 125, 2008. (In Engl.) 2. Damasio, A. Looking for Spinosa: Joy, sorrow and the feeling brain. Orlando (FL): Harcourt, 2003. (In Engl.) 3. Smith, Ch. Moral, believing animals: Human personhood and culture. N.Y: Oxford univ. press, 2003. (In Engl.) 4. Sources of the self: The making of modern identity / ed. by Ch. Taylor. Cambridge (MA): Harvard univ. press, 1989. (In Engl.) 5. Skitka, L. J., Bauman C. W., Mullen E. Morality and justice: An expanded theoretical perspective and empirical review. Advances in group processes. Bingley, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2008. (In Engl.) 6. Turner, J. H., Stets J. E. Moral emotions. Handbook of the sociology of emotions / Ed. by J. H. Turner, J. E. Stets. N.Y: Springer, 2006: 544–566. (In Engl.) 7. Karmadonov, O. A. Norms and empathy as factors of social transformations. Sociological research, no. 4, рр. 17–25, 2012. (In Rus.) 8. Karmadonov, O. A., Kovrigina, G. D. Resources of the socio-cultural consolidation of the Russian society. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University, 2017. (In Rus.) 9. Molodov, O. B. Social consolidation in a new reality: the problem of social activity and identity of the population of the region. Problems of the development of the territory, no. 2, pp. 82–97, 2016. (In Rus.) 10. Simonova, O. A. Moral emotions and social associations // Socio-cultural practices of cohesion in modern societies / under total. ed. N. E. Pokrovsky, M. A. Kozlova. M: University book, no. 7, pp. 137–155, 2015. (In Rus.) 11. Smirnova O. A. Modern sociology of emotions and the problem of social solidarity: the main directions of research. Sociological Yearbook, no. 1, pp. 95–142, 2011. (In Rus.) 12. Kirilina, T. Yu. The place of moral sociology in the system of social sciences. Social and humanitarian knowledge, no. 6, pp. 91–95, 2008. (In Rus.) 13. Sokolov, V. M. Sociology of morality ‒ real or hypothetical. Sociological research, no. 8, pp. 78–88, 2004. (In Rus.) 14. Ignatow, G. Culture and embodied cognition: Moral discourses in Internet support groups for overeaters. Social forces. Chapel Hill (NC), no. 2, pp. 643–669, 2009. (In Engl.) 15. Black, D. Moral time. N. Y: Oxford univ. press, 2011. (In Engl.) 16. Haidt, J. Morality. Perspective on psychological science. Malden (MA), no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2008. (In Engl.) 17. Haidt, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological rev. Wash, no. 4, pp. 814–834, 2001. (In Engl.) 18. Hitlin, S. Social psychological ingredients for a sociology of morality. The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality and social solidarity / ed. by V. Jeffries. L: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014: 195–216. (In Engl.) 19. Stets, J. E., Carter, M. J. A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American sociological rev. Menasha (WI), no. 1, pp. 120–140, 2012. (In Engl.) 20. Schwartz, S. H., Bilsky, W. Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, no. 3, pp. 550–562, 1987. (In Engl.)
Full articleModern Reading of the Sociology of Morality