| Annotation |
The socio-cultural cross-border is a space of interaction between cultures, which results in special social,
cultural, socio-anthropological changes. The relevance of the research topic is determined by the fact that the
socio-cultural space in which a person is located is constantly changing, exposed to outside influences, filled
with new symbols, meanings, which is expressed in the transformation of the foundations of human life, cultural
values, changes in his identity and the emergence of new personality types (“a marginal person”, “a transboundary
person”), in the very ontological foundations of a person, changes in the boundaries of the space of his own
identification, social relationships. The essence of the problem of human identity in the cross-border area is that,
on the one hand, the person himself becomes cross-border, on the other hand, the cross-border area requires
him to have a multidirectional orientation in self-identification. The aim of the work is to trace the influence of a
multilayer transboundary space and the corresponding factors on a person’s identity, and to identify the types
of personality and corresponding identity within the transboundary. The work uses dialectical, systemic, axiological,
anthropological research methods, which together allowed a comprehensive approach to the analysis of
the problem. As a result of the study of the influence of cross-border areas on human identity, some of its types
were identified: cross-border, marginal, and transit ones. The work draws the following conclusions. A feature of
identification in a transboundary space is its possible “transit” nature, which is determined by the search for new
cultural forms close to a person and the constant transition in this regard from one form to another. Axiological
involvement plays an important role in the identification of a person within a transboundary space, what he is
guided by, what is important for him. Value orientations as the foundations of identity can be viewed through the
prism of such positions as “our own-someone else’s”, “close-alien”, “I / we-they”, etc. The similarity of material
and spiritual elements of culture, shared values serve as the basis for the formation of such meaningful characteristics
of the transboundary sociocultural space as identity and self-awareness. |
| References |
1. Neklessa, A. I. Metamorphosis of civilizational transit. Evolutional marathon and social mentality.
Metaphysics, no. 1, 2021. Web. 02.09.2021. http://www.intelros.ru/pdf/metafizika/2021_01/3.pdf (In Rus.)
2. Neklessa, A. I. Transboundary: its landscapes and inhabitants. From a conversation on the shore of Lake
Teletskoye. Web. 02.09.2021. http://viperson.ru/articles/aleksandr-neklessa-transgranichie-ego-landshafty-iobitateli-
iz-besedy-na-beregu-teletskogo-ozera (In Rus.)
3. Zimina, N. S. Socio-philosophical analysis of ethnocultural diversity. Humanitarian vector, no. 2, pp. 13–
20, 2019. (In Rus.)
4. Held, D. et al. Global Transformations. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999. (In Engl.)
5. Abramova, N. A., Pin, Li. Problems of regionalization: cultural aspect. The bulletin of Irkutsk State
University. Series Political science and religion studies, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2009. (In Rus.)
6. Dergachev, V. A. Regional Studies. Scientific works in seven books. Book 2. Web. 02.09.2021. http://
www.dergachev.ru/book-7/01.html (In Rus.)
7. Hall, S. The Local and the Global: Globalization and Ethnicity. Culture, Globalization and the World-
System. Contemporary Conditions for the Representation of Identity / ed. by King, A. D. Minneapolis: University
of Minnesota Press, 1997: 19–41. (In Engl.)
8. Martinez, O. J. Border People. Life and Society in the U. S. Mexico borderlands. Tucson, London:
University of Arizona Press, 1994. (In Engl.)
9. Perkman, M. Cross-Border Regions in Europe. Significance and Drivers of Regional Cross-Border
Cooperation. European Urban and Regional Studies, no. 2, pp. 153–171, 2003. (In Engl.)
10. Huntington, S. The clash of civilizations. M: AST: Astrel, 2011. (In Rus.)
11. Kosolapov, N. A. Space-based and organization-based approach in theory of international relations.
International trends. Journal of international relations theory and world politics. Web. 02.09.2021. http://www.
intertrends.ru/fifteen/005.htm (In Rus.)
12. Gromueko, Yu. V. Anthropology of political identity. Self-determination of “Russians” in the global world.
Territorial development, multinational corporations and Russian identity Russians. M: ARKTI, 2006. (In Rus.)
13. Bober, Zh. Approaches to the study of the problem of marginality. Tsarskoye Selo readings. 2011: 123–
126. (In Rus.)
14. Romanova, N. P., Lekontseva, K. V. Cross-border region: evolution of theoretical and methodological
approaches. Transbaikal state university journal, no. 6, pp. 95–105, 2013. (In Rus.)
15. Saynakov, N. A. Definition of marginality, methodological perspectives in historical studies. Tomsk State
University journal, no. 375, pp. 97–101, 2013. (In Rus.)
16. Park, R. Human migration and the marginal man. Social and Human Sciences. Domestic and foreign
literature, series 11. Sociology, no. 3, pp. 167–177, 1998. (In Rus.)
17. Yemchenko, D. G. Marginal man in the context of a culture of cross-border region. Chelyabinsk State
University journal. Philosophy. Sociology. Cultural Studies, no. 11, pp. 47–50, 2009. (In Rus.)
18. Alekseev, K. A. The marginal identity in the conditions of diaspora. Social and humanitarian knowledge,
no. 1, pp. 332–335, 2015. (In Rus.)
19. Gerasimenko, T. I. The role of ethno-cultural regional specificity in the formation of transborder regions.
Russia and the West: the dialogue of cultures, no. 2, 2013. Web. 02.09.2021. http://regionalstudies.ru/journal/
homejornal/rubric/2012-11-02-22-16-38/268--q-q.pdf. (In Rus.)
20. Ivanova, S. Yu. Formation of Russian identity in the face of new challenges. Ed. by Tishkov, V. A.,
Golovnev, A. V. Proceedings of the XI congress of Anthropologists and Ethnologists of Russia. Ekaterinburg:
2–5 July, 2015. М.; Ekaterinburg: IEA RAS, IHA UB RAS, 2015: 57. (In Rus.)
21. Sedelnikov, S. S. Marginalized personality and loss of identity. Web.02.09.2021. http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/
bitstream/handle/2311/30605/marginal%27naya_lichnost%27_i___utrata__identichnosti.pdf?sequence=1. (In
Rus.)
22. Stonequist, E. V. The marginal man: a study in personality and culture conflict. N. Y.: Russell & Russell,
1961. Ch. 7: 159–174. (In Engl.)
23. Magomed-Eminov, M. Sh. Deconstruction and construction of the concept of socialization in
psychological scientific discourse: from socialization to resocialization. Personality in extreme conditions and
crisis situations of life, no. 8, pp. 29–36, 2019. (In Rus.)
24. Kemalova, L. I. Marginal personality: socio-psychological portrait. Sevastopol state technical university
journal, no. 86, pp. 94–97, 2008. (In Rus.)
25. Gurin, S. P. Marginal anthropology. Web. 02.09.2021. http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/
z0000963/st000.shtml (In Rus.)
26. Moiseev, V. I. The images of onto-Sociology: onto-isolates and socio-emergents. Credo New, no. 3,
2015. Web.02.09.2021. http://credo-new.ru/archives/567. (In Rus.)
27. Flier, A. Ya. Essays on the theory of the historical dynamics of culture. M: LLO “Publishing house
‘Consent’”, 2015. (In Rus.)
28. Blyakher, L. E. Dialogue across the border: regional options for cross-cultural economic interaction.
Eurasia Bulletin, no. 4, pp. 93–112, 2003. (In Rus.)
29. Blyakher, L. E. Regional identity and transboundary practices in the Far East, Russia. Spatial economics,
no. 1, pp. 117–132, 2005. (In Rus.)
30. Smith, A. D. National Identity. London: Penguin Books, 1991. |
