| References |
1. Hui Y. What is a digital object? Metaphilosophy, no. 4, pp. 380–395, 2012. (In Engl.)
2. Gavrilina, E. A. Reduction of human agency in a technological context. Philosophy of Science and Technology,
no. 4, 2022. (in print) (In Rus.)
3. Marx, K. Capital. In: K. Marx, F.Engels. Essays. Second edition. Moscow: State Publishing House of
Political Literature, 1960. Vol. 23. (In Rus.)
4. Marcuse, H. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Web.
20.09.2022. https://www.marxists.org/ebooks/marcuse/one-dimensional-man.pdf (In Engl.)
5. Mumford, L. The myth of the machine. Available from: https://archive.org/details/mythofmachine00lewi.
Web. 20.09.2022. (In Rus.)
6. Spengler, O. Der Mensch und die Technik. Web. Web. 20.09.2022. https://archive.org/details/SpenglerOswaldDerMenschUndDieTechnik193152Doppels.
Scan (In Germ.)
7. Jaspers, K. Die Atombombe und die Zukunft des Menschen. Web. 20.09.2022. https://archive.org/details/
dieatombombeundd0000jasp (In Germ.)
8. Heidegger, M. The question of technology. Time and Being: Articles and speeches: Translated from German.
M: Republic, 1993: 221–238 (In Rus.)
9. Simondon, G. On The Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Washington: Published by Univocal
Publishing. (In Engl.)
10. Skopin, D. A. Criticism of hylomorphism and the question of technique in Gilbert Simondon and Martin
Heidegger. Questions of Philosophy, no. 10, pp. 201–210, 2018. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440001161-2 (In Rus.)
11. Heidegger, M. Thing. Time and being: Articles and speeches: Trans. from German. M: Republic, 1993:
316–327. (In Rus.)
12. Hui, Y. On the existence of digital objects / Yuk Hui; foreword by Bernard Stiegler (Electronic mediations;
48). Published by the University of Minnesota Press, 2016. (In Engl.)
13. Knecht, N. P. Gilbert Simondon as a harbinger of the “emancipation of technology”. Fifth Cartesian
readings “Cartesian dualism and the modern picture of the world”: Materials of the International scientifi c and
practical conference, Moscow ‒ Zelenograd, November 15–16, 2018 / Under the general editorship of A. I. Pirogov,
T. V. Rastimeshina. – Moscow ‒ Zelenograd: National Research University “Moscow Institute of Electronic
Technology”, 2018: 06–110. (In Rus.)
14. Pisarev, A., Astakhov, S., Gavrilenko, St. Actor-network theory: Incomplete assembly. Logos, no. 1,
pp. 1–40, 2017. (In Rus.)
15. Latour, B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. M: 2014. (In Rus.)
16. Erofeeva, M. On the possibility of an actor-network theory of action. Sociology of power, no. 4, 2015. URL:
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-vozmozhnosti-aktorno-setevoy-teorii-deystviya. Web. 20.09.2022. (In Rus.)
17. Napreenko, I. V. (2015) Delegation of agency in the concept of Bruno Latour: how to assemble a hybrid
team of cyborgs and anthropomorphs? Sociology of Power, no. 1, 2015. Web. 20.09.2022. URL: https://
cyberleninka.ru/article/n/delegirovanie-agentnosti-v-kontseptsii-bruno-latura-kak-sobrat-gibridnyy-kollektiv-kiborgov-
i-antropomorfov (In Rus.)
18. Deineka, A. V. Anthropology of Modernity as a methodological framework for the analysis of theories
of social action. Universum: Social Sciences: electron. scientifi c. Journal, no. 11, 2017. Web. 20.09.2022. URL:
http://7universum.com/ru/social/archive/item/5242 (In Rus.)
19. Golovashina, O. V. From intersubjectives to interobjectives: social ontology temporal. Moscow: Aquilon,
2019. (In Rus.)
20. Harman, G. Speculative Realism: An Introduction. Published by arrangement with Polity Press Ltd.,
Cambridge, 2019. (In Engl.)
21. Thompson, Ch. Agency through Objectifi cation: Subjectivity and Technology. Logos, no. 5, 2018. Web.
20.09.2022. URL: https://logosjournal.ru/articles/387203 (In Rus.)
22. Malsch, Thomas and Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo. Socionics: Sociological Concepts for Social Systems of Artifi
cial (and Human) Agents. Journal of Artifi cial Societies and Social Simulation, no. 10, 2007. Web. 20.09.2022.
URL: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/1/11.html (In Engl.)
23. Rezaev, A. V., Tregubova, N. D. “Artifi cial intelligence”, “online culture”, “artifi cial sociality”: defi nition
of concepts. Public opinion monitoring: economic and social changes, no. 6, pp. 35–47, 2019. https://doi.
org/10.14515/ monitoring.2019.6.03 (In Rus.)
24. Jon, D. Elhai, J ason, C. Levine, Robert, D. Dvorak, Brian, J. Hall, Fear of missing out, need for touch,
anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 63,
pp. 509–516, 2016. (In Engl.)
25. Fuller, S. Post-Truth: Knowledge As A Power Game (Key Issues in Modern Sociology). published in UK
and USA by Anthem Press, 2018. (In Engl.)
26. Klowait, N. (2018) Refl exive anthropomorphism: ignorance of ontology or ignorant ontology? Sociological
Journal, no. 1, pp. 8–33, 2018. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2018.24.1.5711(In Rus.)
27. Urry, J. What is the future? Cambridge: Polity, 2016. (In Engl.)
28. Suchman L. Human-machine Reconfi gurations: Plans and Situated Actions. M.: Elementary forms,
2019. (In Rus. )
29. Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish]. Web. 20.09.2022. URL: http://www.e-reading.club/book.php?-
book=95796 (In Rus.) |
