Article
Article name	An Open Model of Cultural Dialogue in the Context of Safe Social Interaction
Authors	Zeynalov H.G.Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, zggo@mail.ru Vinogradova I.B.Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor virene82@mail.ru Shulugina G.A.Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor shuluginagalina@mail.ru Abdullaev A.Z.Doctor of Philosophy, Professor alikram@mail.ru Eliseev M.A.Postgraduate Student Maximrm@icloud.com
Bibliographic description	Zeynalov H. G., Vinogradova I. B., Shulugina G. A., Abdullaev A. Z., Eliseev M. A. An Open Model of Cultural Dialogue in the Context of Safe Social Interaction // Humanitarian Vector. 2024. Vol. 19, no. 1. P. 132–141. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2024-19-1-132-141.
Section
DOI	10.21209/1996-7853-2024-19-1-132-141
UDK	008(045)
Article type	Original article
Annotation	Within the framework of the systemic crisis of sociocultural life of modern society, the problem of dialogue of cultures in the aspect of its safe implementation for interacting subjects has a particular significance. The article is devoted to the problem of ensuring systemic security of the interaction of cultures, the preservation of individual cultural elements and the survival of the entire system. The problem of the research is to discover the contradiction between the process of interaction of cultures and the need to ensure their general security and survival as an integrity in the conditions of maintaining the system of interaction and co-existence of cultures. The purpose of the article is to study models of dialogue between cultures in the history of European civilization and to identify the form that meets the challenges of our time in the conditions of the formation of a new world order. The research was based on the cultural-historical method and the method of theoretical modeling. The theoretical source of the research is primarily Russian philosophy of the second half of the twentieth century, in particular the philosophy of dialogue by M. M. Bakhtin, V. S. Bibler and others. In the course of analyzing the history of European civilization, the authors identified three models of dialogue between cultures in the context of ensuring the safe existence of society: 1. The ancient “separation” model; 2. Classical unification model of the New Age; 3. Modern open dialogue model. The authors come to the conclusion that it is necessary to form an open model of dialogue between cultures, which is proposed as a model for the safety of social interaction. It is characterized by fundamental openness, incompleteness of dialogue, as co-existence in borderline, limit states, at points of contact and interaction of dialogizing subjects. The prospects of the study are aimed at revising the basic characteristics and postulates of modern culture in order to determine the constitutive role of dialogue in the formation of a new (mixed) reality and the mechanism of its functioning.
Key words	dialogue of cultures, safe social interaction, open model of dialogue of cultures, M. M. Bakhtin,East and West, multiculturalism
Article information
References	1. Bibler, V. S. On the edges of the logic of culture. Book of selected essays. M: Russian Phenomenological Society, 1997. (In Rus.) 2. Mikhelson, S. V. Understanding the “other” in the dialogue of cultures. Man and culture, no. 5, pp. 47– 60, 2023. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8744.2023.5.40953. EDN: BUAVCZ. Web. 14.01.2024. https://nbpublish.com/ library_read_article.php?id=40953. (In Rus.) 3. Bakhtin, M. M. Dialogue of Dostoevsky. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. M: Fiction, 1972. Web: 14.01.2024. http://az.lib.ru/b/bahtin_m_m/text_1963_problemy_poetiki_dostoevskogo.shtml. (In Rus.) 4. Bakhtin, M. M. Dostoevsky’s polyphonic novel and its coverage in critical literature. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. M.: Fiction, 1972. Web. 14.01.2024. http://az.lib.ru/b/bahtin_m_m/text_1963_problemy_ poetiki_dostoevskogo.shtml. (In Rus.) 5. Bibler, V. S. From scientific teaching to the logic of culture: Two philosophical introductions in the 21st century. M: Politizdat, 1990. (In Rus.) 6. Shpet, G. G. Thought and Word. G. G. Shpet. Selected works. Edited and compiled by T. G. Shchedrina. M.: ROSSPEN, 2005. (In Rus.) 7. Frank, S. L. Spiritual foundations of society. M: Republic,1992. (In Rus.) 8. Bibikhin, V. V. Word and event. Writer and literature. M.: Russian Foundation for the Promotion of Education and Science, 2010. (In Rus.) 9. Stepin, V. S. Globalization, dialogue of cultures and the search for new development strategies. Philosophical anthropology and philosophy of culture. M.: Academic project: Alma Mater, 2015: 243–255. (In Rus.) 10. Dvorkin, I. S. What is the philosophy of dialogue? Historical interaction of different schools. Questions of Philosophy, no. 5, pp. 47–58, 2022. (In Rus.) 11. Zarapin, O. V. Philosophical dialogue in the process of human-machine communication. How does “Digital Socrates” work? “The Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Lab / Digital Scientist: Laboratory of a Philosopher”, no. 4, 2022. DOI: 10.32326/2618–9267-2022–5-3–94-108. Web. 14.02.2024. http://www.digital-scholar.unn. ru/2022-nomer-4/filosofskij-dialog-v-protsesse-cheloveko-mashinnoj-kommunikatsii-kak-dejstvuet-tsifrovojsokrat. (In Rus.) 12. Liu, Shuang. ‘Living with others: mapping the routes to acculturation in a multicultural society. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, no. 31, pp. 761–778, 2007. Web. 14.01.2024. https://www.webofscience.com/ wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000250791700008?SID=EUW1ED0C73WBCzpqnX4sPJtZrmngH 9. (In Engl.) 13. Heredia R. C. The Dialogue of Cultures: From Paranoia to Metanoia. Economic and Political Weekly, no. 21, pp. 1982–1989, 2007. DOI: 10.2307/4419641. Web. 14.01.2024. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/262127240_The_Dialogue_of_Cultures_From_Paranoia_to_Metanoia. (In Engl.) 14. Lipets, E. Y., Serdyukova, E. V., Agapova E. A. Dialogue of Cultures in the Context of Globalization: An Ethnic Aspect. European Research Studies Journal, 2018. Vol. XXI, Special Issue 2, pp. 369–376. DOI: 10.35808/ersj/1263. Web. 14.01.2024. https://www.um.edu.mt/library (In Engl.) 15. Tadmor, C. T., Tetlock P. E. ‘Biculturalism: a model of the effects of second-cultural exposure on acculturation and integrative complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, no. 37, pp. 173–290, 2006. Web. 14.01.2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Biculturalism-A-Model-of-the-Effects-of-Exposure-on- Tadmor-Tetlock/d5cf0426e3fea011c9869d6804585a8285a3551b. (In Engl.) 16. Safonova, V. V. Communicative Education in the Context of the Dialogue of Cultures and Civilizations. The XXV annual international academic conference, language and culture, 20–22 October 2014. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 154, Pp. 57–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.112. (In Engl.) 17. Popov, D. V. Mutual understanding in the dialogue of cultures. Bulletin of the Khorezm Academy Mamun. Khiva, no. 9, pp. 326–328, 2021. (In Rus.) 18. Melikov, I., Tabasaranskii, R., Akhmedova, T. Dialogue Of Cultures As An Alternative To Tolerance In Intercultural Communication. Proceedings of the Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism (SCTCMG 2019), 14–15 June 2019. Complex Research Institute named after Kh. I. Ibragimov. Web. 14.01.2024. https://www.europeanproceedings.com/book-series/EpSBS/books/vol76-sctcmg-2019. (In Rus.) 19. Buryak, N. Yu. A dialogue of cultures in the modern globalizing word. Innovative Science, no. 11-3, pp. 186–187, 2016. (In Rus.) 20. Savignon, S. J., Sysoyev, P. V. Sociocultural Strategies for a Dialogue of Cultures. The Modern Language Journal, no. 4, pp. 508–524, 2002. (In Engl.) 21. Buber, M. Me and You. M: Penguin, 2023. (In Rus.) 22. Ebner, F. The Word and Spiritual Realities. From Self to Other: Collection of translations on problems of intersubjectivity, communication, dialogue. Minsk, 1997: 30–43. (In Rus.) 23. Levinas, E. Time and the other = Le temps et l’autre; The humanism of another person = Humanisme de l’autre homme / Per. from fr. A. V. Paribka. St. Petersburg. Higher religious-philosophical school, 1998. (In Rus.) 24. Lotman, Yu. M. Semiosphere. Culture and explosion. St. Petersburg: Art-SPb, 2010. (In Rus.) 25. Sugrobova, Yu. Yu., Karpova, I. D., Dorofei, Yu. O. Parameters of the anthropological crisis and the modern global generation. Man and Culture, no. 6, 2020. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8744.2020.6.34308. Web. 14.01.2024. https:///nbpublishxomlbrary_read_artide.php?id=34308. (In Rus.) 26. Gold, J., Anderson, L., Clarke, J., Thorpe, R. To Act and Learn: A Bakhtinian Exploration of Action Learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, issue 2, 2009. Web. 14.01.2024. http://www.tandfonline.com/ doi/abs/10.1080/14767330903006778 (In Engl.) 27. Emerson, B. The First Hundred Years of Mikhail Bakhtin. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1997. (In Engl.) 28. Bakhtin, M. M. On the methodology of the humanities. Aesthetics of verbal creativity. M: 1986: 381–432. (In Rus.)
Full article	An Open Model of Cultural Dialogue in the Context of Safe Social Interaction