Article | |
---|---|
Article name | To the Question of the -ing Form History in English |
Authors | Sokolova A.Y.Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor alinasokolova.tver@yandex.ru |
Bibliographic description | Sokolova A. Yu. To the Question of the -ing Form History in English // Humanitarian Vector. 2018. Vol. 13, No.1. PP. 18–23. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2018-13-1-18-23. |
Section | |
DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2018-13-1-18-23 |
UDK | 811.11-112 |
Article type | |
Annotation | This article presents the conclusions of the analysis of the forms of the present participle and the verbal noun in Old English and Middle English texts. In the Old English period, the present participle and the verbal noun were two different parts of speech, having their own forms, grammatical features and functions. In the Old English period, the present participle has a dual nature ‒ nominal (attributive) and verbal. The nominal nature is primary, while the verbal was acquired in the process of participles’ involvement in the verbal paradigm. In the Old English period, verbal nouns do not show any verbal features. They are exclusively substantive in nature. In the Middle English period, the present participle coincides in form with the verbal noun. In the late Middle English texts, only one form in -ing are recorded, in which the Old English forms of the verbal noun and the present participle are combined. In this paper, facts are cited indicating an existence of one united -ing (-yng) form. The study showed that in Middle English texts forms in -ing (-yng) are closely intertwined functionally. The united -ing form in the Middle English period expands its functions and valency characteristics. To the verbal, attributive and adverbial features of Old English participles it adds the substantive functions and the valency of the verbal noun. |
Key words | Old English period, Middle English period, the present participle, the verbal noun, -ing form |
Article information | |
References | 1. Brunner, K. History of the English language: in two volumes. B. A. Il’isha editors. M: Editorial URSS, 2003. (In Rus.). 2. Plotkin, V. Ya. The system of the English language. M: Vysshaja shkola, 1989. (In Rus.). 3. Smirnitsky, A. I. The old English language. M: MGU, 1998. (In Rus.). 4. Comparative grammar of the Germanic languages. Vol. IV Morphology. M: Nauka, 1966. (In Rus.). 5. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language // ed. by Dr. Ernest Klein. Amsterdam, London, New York: Elsevier Publishing Company, 1966. (In Engl.) 6. Ælfric’s Colloquy. Web.17.06.2003. http://www.ucalgary.ca/UofC/eduweb/engl401/texts/frame.html (In Engl.) 7. Callaway, M. The Appositive Participle in Anglo-Saxon. Baltimore: The Modern Language Association of America, 1901. (In Engl.) 8. Duffley Patrick, J. The English gerund ‒ participle: a comparison with the infinitive. New York: Lang, 2006. (In Engl.) 9. Houston, A. The English gerund: syntactic change and discourse function. Language change and variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1989: 173–196. (In Engl.) 10. King Alfred’s Version of Gregory’s Pastoral Care. Vol. 1–2. London: Trübner & CO., 1871–1872. (In Engl.) 11. Lass, R. Phonology and morphology // The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 2: 1066–1476. Cambridge: CUP, 1992: 23–155. (In Engl.) 12. Quirk, R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. The comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, New York: Longman, 1985. (In Engl.) 13. Quirk, R., Wrenn, C. L. An old English Grammar. London: Methuen and Co, Ltd., 1960. (In Engl.) 14. Swan, M. Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 15. Sweet, H. A New English Grammar. Vols. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1892, 1898. 16. The Wanderer. Roy F. Leslie editor. University of Exeter, 1985. (In Engl.) 17. Thorpe, B. The Homilies of Ælfric: 2 vols. London: Ælfric Society, 1844, 1846. (In Engl.) 18. Three Old English Elegies. The Wife‘s Lament. The Husband‘s Message. The Ruin. Roy, F. Leslie editor. University of Exeter, 1988. (In Engl.) 19. Weyhe H. Zu den Altenglischen Verbalabstrakten auf –nes und –ing –ung. Halle: Verlag von Max Niemeyer, 1911. (In Engl.) |
Full article | To the Question of the -ing Form History in English |