| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Political Text in Terms of Communicative Transgression |
| Authors | Melnik G.S.Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor melnik.gs@gmail.comMisonzhnikov B.Y.Doctor of Philology, Professor b.misonzhnikov@spbu.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | |
| DOI | |
| UDK | 070 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The principles of postmodernism have largely changed the system of values. There has been a profound transformation of the nature of human consciousness, which is immersed in a semiotic space and serves as an active subject of the creation of the world consumption of signs and sign systems. Postnonclassical rationalism, despite its potential, has not given the possibility to get out of the circle of postmodernism, and transgression tenaciously holds subject of social action in it. As a result, there is as well a process of modifying the political text as an essential component of the overall political discourse. “Transgression of indifference” which is transformed into “ignorance of the law” is alleged, which entails a distortion of the political-social and humanitarian imperatives, bans are perceived conditionally, reality deforms and myths are treated as objective and authentic in terms of palpable phenomena. As a result, adequate perception of the world is undermined, cultural and mental bases for building efficient methodological cognitive structure in discursive terms are distorted, which could have serious negative consequences for mediumistic function of the text as a complex multicode phenomenon, especially for a political text that explains many abnormal phenomena including religious-political extremism, which can be observed in today’s media discourse. |
| Key words | mass media, postnonclassical rationalism, transgression, power, separatism and religion |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Batai Zh. Zapret i transgressiya [Elektronnyi resurs] / per. s fr. E. Gerasimovoi. Rezhim dostupa: http://vispir.narod.ru/bataj2.htm (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2015). 2. Batai Zh. Vnutrennii opyt / per. s fr., poslesl. i komment. S. L. Fokina. SPb.: Aksioma, Mifril, 1997. 3. Deineka O. S. Zabarin A. V. Psikhologo-politicheskie osnovaniya gruppovogo destruktivnogo po-vedeniya // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014. № 6 [Elektronnyi zhurnal]. Rezhimdostupa: http://www.science-education.ru/120-r15837 (data obrashcheniya: 15.06.2015). 4. Ivanenko G. S. Analiz form rechevogo vozdeistviya na adresata kak aspekt sudebnogo issledovaniya ekstremistskogo teksta // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov, 2008. S. 82–87. 5. Parton T. A., Chernyi Yu. Yu. Chelovek v potoke istorii: vvedenie v sotsiologiyu kul’tury Al’freda Vebera. M.: Nauka, 2006. 170 s. 6. Stadnikov M. G. Global’nye predposylki rasprostraneniya sovremennogo ekstremizma // Politicheskie, sotsiokul’turnye i mediinye determinanty rasprostraneniya ekstremizma (na primere Severo-Zapadnogo federal’nogo okruga): materialy kruglogo stola (04.12.2012 g., Sankt-Peterburg) / pod obshch. red. A. B. Feonicheva. SPb., 2013. 84 s. 7. Stepin V. S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya [Elektron-nyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://iph.ras.ru/uplfile/root/ stepin/klassika,_neklassika,_iostneklassika.pdf (data obra-shcheniya: 10.06.2015). |
| Full article | Political Text in Terms of Communicative Transgression |
