Article
Article name	Peculiarities of Time Perspective of Families Nurturing Children with Disabilities
Authors	Kulik A.A.Candidate of Psychology, Associate Professor anastasija81@yandex.ru
Bibliographic description
Section
DOI
UDK	159.922.761
Article type
Annotation	The article provides the results of the empirical study confirming the fact that a complicated life situation related to the presence of a disabled child in a family brings to temporal personality’s disintegration. It shows that the absence of distinct link between life events and future perspective leads to the narrowing of time continuum. Fears stipulated by the indefiniteness of child’s disease termination are actualized among the conception of future representation. At the same time, parents of disabled children possess the specific settings upon child’s recovery assisting to the partial involvement of adaptive resources that allow them to overcome the negative experience related to their own and the child’s future. The lasting impact of stressful factors brings to the displacement of temporal perspective content by negative sorrows.The complicated issues of the disabled child’s upbringing in a family imply special social and psychological protection and support leading to social integration.
Key words	time perspective, image of future, disability, complicated life situation, life events
Article information
References	1. Abul’hanova-Slavskaya K. A. Strategiya zhizni. M.: Mysl’, 1991. 299 s. 2. Abul’hanova K. A., Berezina T. N. Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2001. 304 s. 3. Arestova O. N. Operatsional’nye aspekty vremennoy perspektivy lichnosti // Voprosy psihologii. 2000. № 4. S. 61–73. 4. Galasyuk I. N. Problema psihicheskoy travmatizatsii chlenov sem’i invalida // Vestnik MGU. Ser. Psihologicheskie nauki. 2011. № 1. S. 54–60. URL: http: // elibrary.ru (data obrascheniya: 13.02.2012). 5. Ginzburg M. R. Psihologicheskoe soderzhanie lichnostnogo samoopredeleniya // Voprosy psihologii. 1994. № 3. S. 43–52. 6. Dobryakov I. V., Zaschirinskaya O. V. Psihologiya sem’i i bol’noy rebenok: hrestomatiya. SPb.: Rech’, 2007. 400 s. 7. Zaborina L. G. Izuchenie sostoyaniya psihologicheskoy napryazhennosti i emotsional’nyh perezhivaniy u roditeley, vospityvayuschih detey-invalidov // Sibirskiy psihologicheskiy zhurnal. 2007. № 26. S. 136–140. URL: http: // elibrary.ru (data obrascheniya: 10.03.12). 8. Zalobina A. N. Osobennosti mezhlichnostnyh otnosheniy detey-invalidov, ih semey i obschestva // Uchenye zapiski SPbGIPSR. 2008. № 1. S.88–90. URL: http: // elibrary.ru (data obrascheniya: 10.03.12). 9. Levin K. Dinamicheskaya psihologiya: izbrannye trudy. M.: Smysl, 2001. 572 s. 10. Mandrikova E. Yu. Sovremennye podhody k izucheniyu vremennoy perspektivy lichnosti // Psihologicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. T. 29. № 4. S. 54–63. 11. Mastyukova E. M., Moskovkina A. G. Semeynoe vospitanie detey s otkloneniyami v razvitii: ucheb. posobie / pod red. V. I. Seliverstova. M.: Vlados, 2003. 408 s. 12. Muzdybaev K. Perezhivanie vremeni v period krizisov // Psihologicheskiy zhurnal. 2000. T. 21. № 4. S. 5–21. 13. Nyutten Zh. Motivatsiya, deystvie i perspektiva buduschego / pod red. D. A. Leont’eva. M.: Smysl, 2004. 608 s. 14. Pevneva A. N. Psihologicheskie sostoyaniya materey detey s tserebral’nym paralichom kak ishodnye predposylki psihologicheskogo sindroma // Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie: elektronnyj zhurnal. 2011. № 2. URL: www.psyedu.ru (data obrascheniya: 10.04.12) 15. Petrenko V. F. Osnovy psihosemantiki. 2-e izd., dop. SPb.: Piter, 2005. 480 s. 16. Podgotovka detey-invalidov k semeynoy i vzrosloy zhizni. Posobie dlya roditeley i spetsialistov / pod red. E. R. Yarskoy-Smirnovoy. Saratov: Nauch. kn., 2007. 188 s. URL: Travma − live.ru (data obrascheniya: 10.03.12). 17. Potashova I. I. Sovremennye aspekty psihologo-pedagogicheskoy raboty s sem’yami, vospityvayuschimi rebenka s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostyami zdorov’ya // Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie: elektronnyj zhurnal. 2011. № 3. URL: www.psyedu.ru (data obrascheniya: 10.04.12). 18. Regush L. A. Psihologiya prognozirovaniya: uspehi v poznanii buduschego. SPb.: Rech’, 2003. 352 s. 19. Rubinshteyn S. L. Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir. SPb.: Piter, 2003. 512 s. 20. Savina V. S., Charova O. B. Osobennosti materinskih ustanovok po otnosheniyu k detyam s narusheniyami v razvitii // Voprosy psihologii. 2002. № 6. S. 15–23. 21. Serkin V. P. Metody psihosemantiki: ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vuzov. M.: Aspekt Press, 2004. 207 s. 22. Serkin V. P. Blank semanticheskogo differentsiala dlya otsenki predstavleniy o vremeni // Psihologicheskaya diagnostika. 2007. № 5. S. 30–35. 23. Syrtsova A., Mitina O. V. Vozrastnaya dinamika vremennyh orientatsiy lichnosti // Voprosy psihologii. 2008. № 2. S. 41–53. 24. Tverskaya O. N. Evolyutsiya tseli i soderzhaniya semeynogo vospitaniya rebenka s osobymi obrazovatel’nymi potrebnostyami v otechestvennoy pedagogike XX veka i harakteristika semey, vospityvayuschih detey s narusheniyami razvitiya // Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008. № 1. S. 136–142. URL: http: // elibrary.ru (data obrascheniya: 10.03.12). 25. Frankl V. Psihoterapiya na praktike: per.s nem. SPb.:Rech’, 2001. 256 s. 26. Horosheva E. V. Sravnitel’noe issledovanie semey, imeyuschih rebenka s normativnym i narushennym razvitiem // Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2010. № 5. S. 52–59. 27. Shipitsyna L. M. Neobuchaemyj rebenok v sem’e i obschestve. SPb.: Didaktika Plyus, 2002. 496 s.
Full article	Peculiarities of Time Perspective of Families Nurturing Children with Disabilities