References |
1. Alekseeva, I. Yu., Arshinov, V. I., Chekletsov, V. V. “Techno-People” against “Post-People”: NBIKS-Revolution
and the Future of a Human Being. Philosophy Problems, no.4, pp. 12–19, 2013. (In Rus.)
2. Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Collected works. Moscow: Enlightenment Publ. Vol. 4. 1984. (In Rus.)
3. Astashova, N. D., Fortunatov, A. N. The Consumption by Information as a Property of Post-industrial Society.
Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke, no. 2, pp. 35–42, 2016. (In Rus.)
4. Baudrillard, J. The Transparency of Evil. Moscow: Retur Publ., 2000. (In Rus.)
5. Challenges of Information Epoch. Web: 10.01.2018. http://www. capital_rus.ru. (In Rus.)
6. Indigo Children. Searching For a New Kind of Human. A Human without Boundaries, no. 5, pp. 4–15, 2006.
(In Rus.)
7. Dubrovsky, D. I. Human Nature, Anthropological Crisis and Cyber Immortality. The Global Future. Convergent Technologies (NBIKS) and Trans human Evolution. Moscow: The Research Board of Russia 2045 Strategical Social Initiative Publ. 2013: 237–252 . (In Rus.)
8. Emelin, V. A. Technology as a Factor of Identity Transformation: Development of Homo Technologicus. The National Psychological Journal, no. 1 (21), pp. 9–18, 2016. (In Rus.)
9. Ivanov, A. V. The Psychology of Reading or the Culture of Information Consumption. Web. 10.01.2018. http://www.youtube.com(In Rus.)
10. Katasonov, V. I. Transhumanism: The New Civilizational Threat to Humanity. Web. 10.01.2018. https://www.riss.ru/analitycs/66 (In Rus.)
11. Kozhevnikova, M. The Hybrid Man of the Future: about the Loss of “Human Nature”. The Problem of Natural and Social Ratio in Society and a Human Being. Proceedings of the VIIth International Conference. Chita, ZabGU. . 2016: 215–229. (In Rus.)
12. Leibin, V. M. The Importance of Informational and Communicational Technologies in the Change of the Relations among the Imaginary, the Symbolic and the Real. Philosophy Problems, no. 6, pp. 93–103, 2011. (In Rus.)
13. Losik, G. V. A Lemma about the Anthropogenic Nature of the Informational Technology Development. Web. 10.01.2018. http://lib.vsu. By (In Rus.)
14. Mustafaeva, G. N. Social Aspects of the Internet Addiction. The National Psychological Journal, no. 2,
pp. 14–19, 2012. (In Rus.)
15. Rybakov, O. Yu., Tikhonova, S.V. Social Prospects of Transhumanism. Web. 10.01.2018. https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?issueid=10 (In Rus.)
16. Tishchenko, P. D. The Threat of Multiplicity and the Idea of Humanitarian Expertise. Bioethics and Humanitarian Expertise. 2nd edition, Moscow: RANPubl. 2008: 98–110. (In Rus.)
17.Tkhostov, A. Sh., Surnov, K. G. Modern Technologies Influence on Personality Development and Pathological Forms of Adaptation Formation: The Back Side of Civilization. The Psychological Journal, vol. 26,
no. 6, pp. 15–23, 2005. (In Rus.)
19. Foucault, M. The Care of the Self. Moscow: Refl-buk Publ., 2008. (In Rus.)
20. Brenner, V. Parameters of the Internet Use, Abuse and Addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychological Reports, no. 80, pp. 879–882, 1997. (In Engl.)
21. Jonas, H. The imperative of Responsibility in Search of an Ethics for Technological Age. Chicago, 1984. (In Engl.)
22. More, M. Transhumanism: Towards a Futurist Philosophy. Web. 10.01.2018. http:// www://maxmore.com/transhum.htm (In Engl.)
23. Stock, G., Campbell, J. Engineering the Human Germline. N.Y.: University Press. 2000: 11- 20. (In Engl.)
24. Weinstone, A. Welcome To The Pharmacy: Addiction, Transcendence, and Virtual Reality. Diacritics. Baltimor (N.Y.), vol. 27, no. 3, pp.77–89, 1997. (In Engl.) |