| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Current Media Concepts: Dynamics of Value Meanings |
| Authors | Tsvetova N.S. Doctor of Philology, Professor, cvetova@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Tsvetova N. S. Current Media Concepts: Dynamics of Value Meanings // Humanitarian Vector. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 4. PP. 107–116. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-4-107-116. |
| Section | CONCEPTUAL WORLD VIEW |
| UDK | 81.42 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-4-107-116 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article presents the results of a study on the dynamics of the semantic structure of the modern Russian media discourse key concepts: family, patriotism, and business. On the one hand, the relevance of the topic of the article is due to the huge influencing potential of the media texts. On the other hand, it is due to the design of the semantic-cognitive approach to media speech. The main task of the author is to identify the features of the modernization of the semantic structure of concepts with significant- content. To implement this task, a threestage analytical algorithm was used, which involves the analysis of the lexicographic description of the concept word, identifying its real, the study of discursive interpretation in the media space is the identification of the value component of the semantic structure of the concept presented in journalistic lexical and phraseological stereotypes and to some extent original contexts that form an associative semantic field in which interrelated, mutually conditioned meanings and meanings are presented. The empirical basis of the research is more than 200 media texts of different genres published over two decades in Russian media of different types and different discursive affiliation. The author comes to the conclusion that modern media are actively working, first of all, on the modernization of the axiological (value) component of the semantic structure of mentally significant concepts. The techniques of transformation of conceptual associative-semantic fields are largely associated with the neutralization of conflicts caused by the general attitude of modern media systems to the formation of a consolidated picture of the world with an extremely minimized national component. The prospects for the development of this research topic are connected with the development of the axiology of journalism and with the formation of such a direction of media studies as media anthropology, with the development of new analytical methods corresponding to the long – standing idea of M. M. Bakhtin, who insists on the need to create national comparative studies – a scientific direction that combines the achievements of many humanitarian disciplines. |
| Key words | media concept, semantic structure, associative-semantic field, value component, axiology of journalism, media anthropology |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Sedov, K. F. M. M. Bakhtin – the banner of national anthropolinguistics. Bakhtin M. M. Anthropolinguistics: Selected Works. M: Labyrinth, 2010: 3–6. (In Rus.) 2. Stoyanova, E. Money in the Russian linguistic consciousness. Bishop-Constantine and the readings. Shumen: Bishop Konstantin Preslavski, 2009: 60–69. (In Bulgarian) 3. Stoyanova, E. “New Russians” – a new Russian linguocultural phenomenon (based on the material of the Russian press). Shumen: Bishop Constantine and Reading, 2004: 111–122 (In Bulgarian) 4. Pavilenis, R. I. The problem of meaning: modern logical-philosophical analysis of language. M: Mysl’, 1983. (In Rus.) 5. Ufimtseva, N. V. Man and his consciousness: the problem of formation. Language and consciousness: paradoxical rationality. M: 1993: 59–75. (In Rus.) 6. Vorkachev, S. G. Postulates of linguoconceptology. Anthology of concepts. V. 1 / Ed. by V. I. Karasik, I. A. Sternina. Volgograd: Paradigm, 2006: 10–13. (In Rus.) 7.Schur, G.S Field theory in linguistics. Moscow: Nauka, 1974. (In Rus.) 8. Weisgerber, J. L. Native language and the formation of the spirit. M: URSSS, 1993. (In Rus.) 9. Kleparski, G. A, Rusinek, A. The tradition of field theory and the study of lexical semantic change. Studia Anglica Resoviensia, 2007. (In Engl.) 10. Katznelson, S. D. Categories of language and thinking. From the scientific heritage. M: Languages of Slavic culture, 2001. (In Rus.) 11. Martinovich, G. A. Types of verbal connections and relationships in the associative field. Questions of psychology, no. 2, pp. 143–146, 1990. (In Rus.) 12. Nikolsky, S. A., Filimonov V. P. Russian worldview. Meanings and values of Russian life in Russian literature and philosophy of the ХVIII – the middle of the ХIХ century. M: Progress-Tradition, 2008. (In Rus.) 13. Leshchenko, V. Yu. Family and Russian Orthodoxy (XI–XIX centuries). St. Petersburg: Frolova Publishing House. 1999. (In Rus.) 14. Kolesov, V. V., Pimenova, M. V. Linguistic foundations of the Russian mentality. Moscow: Flinta-Nauka, 2016. (In Rus.) 15. Sermyagina, E. A., Porshneva, A. S. Compilation of the associative field of the concept “family” in the Russian language by conducting a free associative experiment. Web. 20.07.2021. https://docviewer.yandex.ru/ view/20142410. (In Rus.) 16. Proverbs of the Russian people. Collection of V. Dahl. Moscow: GIKHL, 1957. (In Rus.) 17. Vodolazkin, E. “The Word about Igor’s Regiment”. Literary Matrix. SPb: Limbus-Press, 2014: 9–25. (In Rus.) 18. Stepanov, Yu. Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture. Ed. 2, corrected and added. M: Academic project, 2001. (In Rus.) 19. Tsvetova, N. S. Concept ‘business’ in the mental space of Russia: the logic of media presentation. Problems of cognitive and functional description of Russian and Bulgarian languages. Shumen: un. Publishing house “Bishop Konstantin Preslavsky” (Bulgaria), 2020: 71–84. (In Bulgarian) 20. Burukina, O. A. Structural deformation of social values as the basis of Russian culture and mentality. Rhetorical paradigm: theoretical and practical aspects, no. 25-1, pp. 11–20, 2020. (In Rus.) |
| Full article | Current Media Concepts: Dynamics of Value Meanings |
| 0 | |
| 20 | |
