| Annotation |
The article deals with some aspects of philosophical anthropology, which, as a doctrine, is built not only on
axiological principles of identification but also is imbued with value construction. The problem of human nature,
its existence in a spatial continuum determines the relevance of the study. The purpose of the work is to summarize
the existing experience accumulated by prominent philosophers in the field of philosophical anthropology,
to analyze the use of axiology as a theory of values, which is used in the philosophical doctrine of man. To
arrange and systematize existing material in order to form a unified concept of philosophical anthropology, the
comparative genetic method was used, and some general scientific methods were also used. And for the solution
of precisely philosophical problems ‒ methods of dialectical, axiomatic, empirical knowledge, represented, in
particular, by description. The author analyzes the features of the development of axiology, in particular aspects
of its typological modeling. The result of the study led to the conclusion that the data in the field of philosophical
anthropology, despite its considerable volume, is not systematized and not summarized in a common large-scale
scientific structure, although it cannot be said that the knowledge of philosophical anthropology exists only as
a prolegomena to the present one science. At the same time, in a rapidly changing reality, consideration of the
problems of human existence is of particular importance. |
| References |
1. Vyzhletsov, G. P. Axiology of culture. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg. University,
1996. (In Rus.)
2. Isaev, S. A. “Dialectical Lyrics” by S. Kierkegaard. Kierkegaard S. Fear and Trembling / transl. from Dannish
by N. V. Isaeva, S. A. Isaeva. M: Respublika, 1993: 5–12. (In Rus.)
3. Fedchin, V. S. Anthropology of Russian philosophers of religious and idealistic orientation at the turn of
the 19th–20th centuries. Bulletin of Irkutsk State Tech. University, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2007. (In Rus.)
4. Terekhov, V. V. Hermeneutic logic of G. G. Shpet. Scientific Notes of the Oryol State University, no. 1,
pp. 87–92, 2011. (In Rus.)
5. Avanesov, S. S. On the ontology of man. Ideas and ideals, no. 4, pp. 51–61, 2014. (In Rus.)
6. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. Method in social anthropology / transl. from English by V. Nikolaev. M: “KANONpress-
C”, “Kuchkovo field”, 2001. (In Rus.)
7. Rudakova, I. V. Sociocultural approach as a methodological principle. Gramota, no. 11, pp. 159–162,
2017. (In Rus.)
8. Lubsky, A. V. Post-non-classical rationality and neo-classical model of social and humanitarian research.
Scientific Thought of the Caucasus, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2015. (In Rus.)
9. Erofeeva, I. V. Axiology of media text in Russian culture (value reflection of journalism at the beginning of
the 21st century). Chita: Transbaikal State Hum. Ped. Un-ty, 2009. (In Rus.)
10. Förster-Nietzsche, E. Die Entstehung von “Also sprach Zarathustra”. Nietzsche F. Also sprach Zarathustra.
Ein Buch für Alle und Keinen. Leipzig: Druck und Verlag von C. G. Naumann, 1903: 475–488. (In Germ.)
11. Gurevich, P. S. Philosophical anthropology of Martin Buber. Philosophical anthropology, no. 2, pp. 6–33,
2021. (In Rus.)
12. Danilevsky, R. Yu. Writing as a sermon (L. Tolstoy and F. Nietzsche). Humanitarian sciences: from the
experience of theoretical interpretation / ed. by Ya. Misonzhnikov. St. Petersburg: Phantoms, 1993: 3–20. (In
Rus.)
13. Betty, E. Hermeneutics as a general methodology of the sciences of the spirit / translation from German
N. V. Borisov. M: “Kanon +ROOI “Rehabilitation”, 2011. (In Rus.)
14. Podoroga, V. A. Apology for the political. M.: Ed. House of the State un-ty ‒ Higher School of Economics,
2010. (In Rus.)
15. Heyde, J. E. Wert. Eine philosophische Grundlegung. Erfurt: Verlag Kurt Stenger, 1926. (In Germ.)
16. Vyzhletsov, G. P. Ontological axiology: origins and modernity. Vestnik of SPbSU. Philosophy and Conflict
studies, vol. 33, issue 3, pp. 275–281, 2017. (In Rus.)
17. Shilov, V. N. Political axiology: monograph. Belgorod: Belgorod Publishing House of State University,
2005. (In Rus.)
18. Lukyanov, V. G. Russian religious axiology. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya, 2015. (In Rus.)
19. Serebrennikova, E. F. Semiometry as a method of axiological analysis. Linguistics and axiology: ethnosemiometry
of value meanings: monograph / ed. by L. G. Vikulova. M: TEZAURUS, 2011. (In Rus.)
20. Lossky, N. O. Favorites. M.: Pravda Publishing House, 1991. (In Rus.)
21. Kant, I. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Leipzig: Verlag Philipp
Reclam jun., 1978. (In Germ.)
22. Luhmann, N. Die Moral der Gesellschaft. 3. Aufl. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2012. (In Germ.)
23. Florensky, P. A., priest. Op. in 4 volumes. V. 1. M: Thought, 1994. (In Rus.)
24. Chukhina, L. A. Philosophical fideism of the epistemological concept of Max Scheler. Criticism of modern
philosophical fideism / ed. by V. A. Steinberg. Riga: Zinatne Publishing House, 1975. (In Rus.)
25. Vyzhletsov, G. P. Axiology of culture. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg university
1996. (In Rus.)
26.Scheler, M. Gesammelte Werke. Bd 3. Vom Umsturz der Werte. Abhandlungen u. Aufsätze. 4. durchges.
Aufl. Bern: A. Francke AG. 1955. (In Germ.)
27. Lokhov, S. A. M. Sheler on the method of philosophical anthropology. Vestn. RUDN. Ser. Philosophy,
no. 3, pp. 197–204, 2020. (In Rus.)
28. Romanov, A. A. Egonal semantics of the visual discourse of habitus. Romanov A. A., Sorokin Yu. A.,
Somaticon: aspects of non-verbal semiotics. M: IYA RAN, TVGU, 2004: 54–63. (In Rus.)
29. Kluck, S. Neue Phänomenologie und Philosophische Anthropologie. Synthesis philosophica, no. 2,
pp. 383–401, 2018. (In Germ.) |
