Article
Article name The Phenomenon of Digital Mediatization: Axiological Aspect of Social Communication
Authors Kuznetsova E.I. Doctor of Philosophy, tvelena@mail.ru
Bibliographic description Kuznetsova E. I. The Phenomenon of Digital Mediatization: Axiological Aspect of Social Communication // Humanitarian Vector. 2022. Vol. 17, No. 2. PP. 154–160. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-2-154-160.
Section AXIOLOGY OF MASS MEDIA
UDK 101.1:316
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-2-154-160
Article type Original article
Annotation The appeal to the problem of mediality is actualized by the need to comprehend the uniqueness of the process of mediatization unfolding in the modern world, which in the digital era is becoming the dominant factor in the development of society. The novelty of the work is determined by the problematization of new facets in the structure of social experience, which are constituted as a result of the process of mediatization changing its forms. The aim is to problematize the features of the socio-cultural experience of the subject in the conditions of developing digital mediatization. The methodology is determined by the socio-philosophical approach to the analysis of the impact of the mediatization of the digital era on the human life world. Reflection acts as a way to clarify the interdependence of a person’s life circumstances, his behavioral characteristics and technical and technological tools for ensuring communication. The phenomenon of mediatization is presented as a developing process, indicating the formation of a new context of human existence. The dual nature of mediatization is revealed: the communicative potential allowing to develop constructive models of social interaction, and the creation of positions of social instability. The expansion of mediatized forms of communication into the space of the human life world is established, the axiological aspects of the process of mediatization are emphasized. The influence of communicative factors on the process of transformation of individual values in the conditions of the mediatized world is proved.
Key words mediatization, media reality, digital mediatization, mediatized worlds, deep mediatization, COVID-19 pandemic
Article information
References 1. Gureeva, A. N. Theoretical understanding of mediatization in a digital environment. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 10. Journalism, no. 6, pp. 192–208, 2016. (In Rus.) 2. Shmeleva, T. V. Mediatization as a Phenomenon of Modern Culture and an Object of Research. Bulletin of the Novgorod State University, no. 90, pp. 145–148, 2015. (In Rus.) 3. Nim, E. G. Exploring the mediatization of society: the concept of mediatized worlds. Sociological journal, no. 3, pp. 8–25, 2017. (In Rus.) 4. Lebedeva, S. E., Vakku, G. V., Stepanova, S. E., Kasatkina, A. E. The main trends in the mediatization of modern socio-cultural space. Bulletin of the Chechen State Pedagogical University. AND I. Yakovlev, no. 4, pp. 69–76, 2018. (In Rus.) 5. Khrul, V. M. Mediatization: a metaprocess, a paradigm or just a fashionable “umbrella”? Mediatization of culture: designing new texts and practices: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Moscow, November 30 ‒ December 2, 2018) / comp. I. S. Dushakova, N. S. Dushakova; Russian text ed. by M. V. Akhmetov; ed. English text ed. by W. Dixon. M: NEOLIT, 2018: 138–144. (In Rus.) 6. Poluehtova, I. A. Sociocultural effects of television mediatization. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, no. 4, pp. 71–82, 2018. (In Rus.) 7. Lundby, K. “Mediatization” as Key. Mediatization: Concepts, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang, 2009. (In Engl.) 8. Hjarvard, S. The Mediatization of Culture and Society. L: Routledge 2013. (In Engl.) 9. Ushanova I. A. Mediatization of Communication: from Concept to Theory. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, no. 11, pp. 2703–2712, 2015. (In Engl.) 10. Kaun, A., Fast K. Mediatization of culture and everyday life. Karlstad University Studies, 2014. (In Engl.) 11. Primakov, V. L. Mediatization and its social consequences. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Social Sciences, no. 1, pp. 222–240, 2020. (In Rus.) 12. Krotz, F., Hepp, A. A Concretization of Mediatization: How Mediatization Works and Why ‘Mediatized Worlds’ are a Helpful Concept for Empirical Mediatization Research. Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, vol. 3, 2011. DOI: 10.1386/ejpc.3.2.137_1. (In Engl.) 13. Lunt, P.; Livingstone, S. Is “mediatization” the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). media cult. soc., no. 38, pp. 462–470, 2016. (In Engl.) 14. Ostrovskaya, E. A. Mediatization of Orthodoxy ‒ is it possible? Monitoring, no. 5, pp. 300–319, 2019. (In Rus.) 15. Klushina, N. I., Baigozhina, D. O., Takhan S.Sh. Mediatization: a stylistic vector. Upper Volga Philological Bulletin, no. 2, pp. 57–62, 2019. (In Rus.) 16. Couldry, N., Hepp, A. Conceptualising Mediatization, Communication Theory, no. 23, pp. 191–202, 2013. (In Engl.) 17. Giddens, E. Organization of society: Essay on the theory of structuration. M., 2005. (In Rus.) 18. Kopecka-Piech, K., & Łódzki, B. (Eds.). The Covid-19 Pandemic as a Challenge for Media and Communication Studies (1st ed.). Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003232049. (In Engl.) 19. Cassirer, E. Philosophy of symbolic forms. V. I Language. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2001. (In Rus.) 20. Srnicek, N. Platform Capitalism. M.: Ed. HSE house; transl. from English: Srnicek N. 2016. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity, 2019. (In Rus.) 21. Hepp, Andreas. Deep Mediatization. Publisher: Routledge, 2020. 10.4324/9781351064903. (In Rus.) 22. Malta, Thiago & Neto, Leopoldino. Technology in education in times of pandemic, 2020. Web. 15.03.2020. https://www.researchgate.net. (In Engl.) 23. Atamanova, I. V., Bogomaz, S. A. Value and activity orientations of university youth: the choice between safety and innovation. Bulletin of the National State Pedagogical University, no. 1, pp. 59–74, 2021. (In Rus.) 24. Ivanovsky, B. G. Digitalization of higher education in Europe and Russia: advantages and risks. Social innovations and social sciences, no. 1, pp. 80–95, 2021. (In Rus.) 25. Torotoeva, A. M., Yadova, M. A. Transformation of higher education in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. (Review of webinars). Social and humanitarian sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Ser. 11, Sociology: Abstract journal, no. 2, pp. 54–65, 2021. (In Rus.) 26. Bolin, Goran. The Uberisation of Higher Eduction: Datafied Dynamics in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic. In book: Katarzyna Kopecka-Piech & Bartłomiej Łódzki (eds) Media Life During/After the COVID 19 Pandemic. Publisher: London: Routledge, 2022: 23–34 (In Engl.) 27. Danilova, L. N. COVID-19 as a factor in the development of education: prospects for digitalization and distance learning. Bulletin of the Surgut State Pedagogical University, no. 5, pp. 124–135, 2020. (In Rus.) 28. Begalinov, A. S., Ashilova, M. S., Begalinova, K. K. On the image of higher education in the post-COVID era: the formation and development of thinking of a new order. Bulletin of the National State Pedagogical University, no. 1, pp. 110–123, 2021. (In Rus.) 29. Hepp, A. The Communicative Figurations of Mediatized Worlds: Mediatization Research in Times of the ‘Mediation of Everything’. European Journal of Communication, vol. 28, pp. 615–629, 2013. 10.1177/0267323113501148. (In Engl.)
Full articleThe Phenomenon of Digital Mediatization: Axiological Aspect of Social Communication
0
41