Article
Article name N. Y. Danilevsky and O. Spengler on “Slavic” and “Romano-Germanic” Cultural-Historical Types and Prospects of Their Interaction (Comparison of the Concept and Method)
Authors Madzharov A.S. Doctor of History, Professor, mas@home.isu.ru
Bibliographic description Madzharov A. S. N. Y. Danilevsky and O. Spengler on “Slavic” and “Romano-Germanic” Cultural-Historical Types and Prospects of their Interaction (Comparison of the Concept and Method) // Humanitarian Vector. 2022. Vol. 17, No. 3. PP. 59–68. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-3-59-68.
Section INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION IN HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT
UDK 008.001(100)(092)
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-3-59-68
Article type Original article
Annotation Thinkers N. Y. Danilevsky and O. Spengler brought together a civilization approach to world history. The relevance of the works of these authors is evidenced by their consonance with the modern historical process. The interrelation of ideas and the relative reliability of the predictions made by the theorists predetermined the purpose of the work: comparison of the concepts of “Slavic” and “Romano-Germanic” cultural and historical types, the study of the applied methodology of research by Danilevsky and Spengler, and the application of the comparative historical method in this work. Danilevsky created a typological direction in historical research, moved away from the interpretation of international relations as a situational phenomenon, realized the importance of historical forecasting. He came to the conclusion that Russia and Europe belong to different cultural and historical types, there are, in modern terms, mental contradictions between them, which in the future could give rise to clashes between civilizations. The studies of the geopolitician convinced him that Europe considered, and will continue to consider our fatherland, a “foreign” and even a “hostile” world. Fifty years after Danilevsky, Spengler spoke about the future of Western civilization. The philosopher’s doctrine developed in the direction laid down by the Russian geopolitician. The philosopher revealed the palette of the Faustian soul “from the inside”, and confirmed the assumptions and fears of Danilevsky. “Faustian culture” as Spengler concluded, “has always been aimed at “spreading”. All thinkers and leaders from Eckhart to Napoleon wanted to “conquer the world”. The coming twentieth century was seen by the philosopher as the era of the “war of inheritance”, in which India, China, South Africa, and Russia would enter. In the list of “mobilized states”, the thinker saw his fatherland in the first place. “Unbearable tension”, he testified, pushes Europe to the true Faustian path ‒ the “primal politics of all living things” ‒ war. The conducted historiographical analysis showed that the morphological attitude of the classics of civilization analysis changed the research paradigm, increased the possibilities of theoretical understanding of the problem, opened up prospects for comparative study of cultures, obtaining the necessary geopolitical forecast today.
Key words N. Y. Danilevsky, O. Spengler, historical research, typology, morphology, applied methodology, concept
Article information
References 1. Sorokin, P. Social philosophies of an age crisis. Boston: Beacon press, 1951. XI. (In Rus.) 2. Sorokin, P. Social and cultural dynamics. The study of changes in large systems of art, truth, ethics, law and public relations. Publishing house of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute. St. Petersburg, 2000. (In Rus.) 3. Avdeeva, L. R. Russian thinkers: Ap. A. Grigoriev, N. Y. Danilevsky, N. N. Strakhov: Philos. culturology of the second half of the XIX century. M: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 1992. (In Rus.) 4. Bazhov, S. I. Philosophy of History of N. Y. Danilevsky. Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy. M: IFRAN, 1997. (In Rus.) 5. Sultanov, K. V. Social philosophy of N. Y. Danilevsky: conflict of interpretations. Sociol. In-t Russian Academy of Sciences. Sociol. M. M. Kovalevsky University. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbSTU, 2001. (In Rus.) 6. Baluyev, B. P. Disputes about the fate of Russia: N. Y. Danilevsky and his book “Russia and Europe”. Tver: Bulat, 2001. (In Rus.) 7. Madzharov, A. S. The History of Russia in the theory of civilizations: a monograph by A. S. Madzharov. Irkutsk: Publishing House of IGU, 2014. (In Rus.) 8. Malinov, A. V. Philosophy and methodology of history in Russia. St. Petersburg State University, Department of History of Russian Philosophy. St. Petersburg: Intersocis, 2015. (In Rus.) 9. Khalapsis, A. V. Philosophy and geopolitics of Nikolai Danilevsky. AP LAMBERT Academic Publishing s managed by: Omni Scriptum Ara Pers GmbH Bahnhofstraße 28, D-66111. Saarbrücken, 2017. (In Rus.) 10. Zimovets, L. G. O. Spengler on the meaning of history. Scientific notes of the Russian State Social University, no. 6, pp. 123–130, 2009. (In Rus.) 11. Rumyantseva, T. G. Methodology of humanitarian cognition by Oswald Spengler (experience of modern reading). The role of women in the development of modern science and education: a collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, May 17–18, 2016, Minsk / BSU; edited by I. V. Kazakova, A. V. Butina, I. V. Olyunina. Minsk: BSU, 2016: 814–819. (In Rus.) 12. Berdyaev, N. A. The dying thoughts of Faust. The Fall of the sacred Russian Kingdom. Moscow: Astrel, 2007: 889–902. (In Rus.) 13. Berdyaev, N. A. Russian idea. St. Petersburg: ABC Classics, 2008. (In Rus.) 14. Madzharov, A. S. Applied methodology as a problem of Russian historiography of the XVIII‒XIX century (problem statement). Humanitarian Vector, no. 6, pp. 57–64, 2019. (In Rus.) 15. Danilevsky, N. Ya. Russia and Europe / Compilation and comments by Yu. A. Belov. M: Institute of Russian Civilization, 2008. (In Rus.) 16. Spengler Oswald. Sunset of the Western world. Moscow: Alpha-book, 2010. (In Rus.) 17. Madzharov, A. S. Afanasy Prokopievich Shchapov: the history of life (1831–1876) and the life of “History”. Irkutsk: Irkutsk Regional Printing House No. 1 named after V. M. Posokhin, 2005. (In Rus.) 18. Berdyaev, N. A. On bourgeoisness and socialism. The Fall of the Sacred Russian Kingdom. Moscow: Astrel, 2007: 544–549. (In Rus.)
Full articleN. Y. Danilevsky and O. Spengler on “Slavic” and “Romano-Germanic” Cultural-Historical Types and Prospects of Their Interaction (Comparison of the Concept and Method)
0
6