Article name The Role of Philosophy in the Development of Strategies for Ensuring Mental Security in the Conditions of “Hybrid Wars” of Our Time
Authors Kovalev A.A. Candidate of Political Science,
Bibliographic description Kovalev A. A. The Role of Philosophy in the Development of Strategies for Ensuring Mental Security in the Conditions of “Hybrid Wars” of Our Time // Humanitarian Vector. 2023. Vol. 18, no. 4. P. 31–41. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2023-18-4-31-41.
Section Culture and society: the face of war
UDK 355.01
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2023-18-4-31-41
Article type Original article
Annotation The practice of the last decade has exacerbated the problem of mental security to the limit within the framework of the general system of national security of the state. To solve this problem, a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach is needed, in which philosophy can take a key position as an integration center of social and humanitarian knowledge. The revival of the significance of philosophy in the face of the challenges and threats of the 21st century forms a serious potential for overcoming them. The “hybridization” of modern wars forces us to abandon stereotyped solutions, rethink values and develop effective strategies to ensure mental security. The purpose of the study is to study mental wars as an element of modern “hybrid wars” and offer a number of recommendations that can be used in the development of mental security strategies. In the 21st century, despite the generally high level of physical security of states, the mental level of national security remains under threat due to the hybridization of modern wars. The analysis of philosophical concepts and the allocation on their basis of the fundamental principles of ensuring mental security will strengthen national security in general, as well as increase the level of competitiveness of the nation in the context of the growing trend of “hybrid wars”. We carried out an interdisciplinary analysis of philosophical concepts and principles that can be used in the context of mental security. Mental wars have become a challenge to the modern nation-state and the entire system of the world order. Turning to philosophy as a discipline that can unite the nation by strengthening the national mentality by creating a kind of mental immunity will help move forward in matters of ensuring mental security in the conditions of “hybrid wars” of our time.
Key words mental wars, national security, philosophical approaches, values, culture, mentality
Article information
References 1. Gardner, H., Benjamin, J., Pettingill, L. An Examination of Trust in Contemporary American Society. Center for Public Leadership, pp. 3–16, 2010. Web. 25.06.2023. (In Engl.) 2. Gardner, G. The structure of the mind: the theory of multiple intelligences: TRANS. from English. M: I. D. William, 2007. (In Rus.) 3. Diamond, J. M. Life with the artificial Anasazi. Nature, vol. 419, pp. 567–569, 2002. (In Engl.) 4. Cisek, P., Hayden, B. Neuroscience needs evolution. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 2021. Web. 25.06.2023. Neuroscience_needs_evolution/link/648cc6c48de7ed28ba30a283/download. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0518. (In Engl.) 5. Abbott, Y., Shah, N., Ward, K.K., McHale, M.T., Alvarez, E.A., Saenz, C.C., Plaxe, S. C. Use of Psychosocial Services Increases after a Social Worker-Mediated Intervention in Gynecology Oncology Patients. Health and Social Work, no. 38, pp. 113–121, 2013. (In Engl.) 6. Il’nitsky, A. M. Hegemon strategy ‒ war strategy. Military thought, no. 6, pp. 18–36, 2023. (In Rus.) 7. Gubanov, N. I., Gubanov, N. N. Mental responses to the emergence of risks in modern society. Bulletin of Slavic cultures, vol. 54, pp. 127–139, 2019. (In Rus.) 8. Pal’tsev, A. I. “Global hybrid war” as a US geopolitical strategy. Humanitarian problems of military affairs, no. 3, pp. 25–35, 2018. (In Rus.) 9. Rozov, N. S. The Nature of War: Macrosociological Analysis of the Essence and Causes of Mass Organized Violence. Humanitarian Vector, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2009. (In Rus.) 10. Aulov, V. K. Review of the concept of mental war: structure and content. Military law, no. 4, pp. 9–17, 2022. (In Rus.) 11. Karavaev, I.N., Sukhanov, P. V. Mental warfare as a new type of confrontation. Bulletin of the Academy of Military Sciences, no. 2, pp. 42–45, 2022. (In Rus.) 12. Friedman, O. “Hybrid war” of concepts. Bulletin of MGIMO–University. Official Internet edition, no. 5, pp. 79–85, 2016. (In Rus.) 13. Komleva, N. A. Hybrid War: Essence and Specificity. Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Series 3: Social Sciences, no. 3, pp. 128–137, 2017. (In Rus.) 14. Kornev, V.V., Paltsev, A. I. Methodological aspects of the conceptual approach to the problem of sociocultural factors of mental terrorism. Humanitarian problems of military affairs, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2021. (In Rus.) 15. Golovinsky, A. A. Changing the Hierarchy of Dominant Personal Values as a Result of Mental War // Bulletin of Adjunct, no. 3, 2021. Web. 25.06.2023. URL: (In Rus.) 16. Surkov, V. Yu. Where has the chaos gone? Unpacking stability. Actual comments (online edition) dated November 20, 2021. Web. 25.06.2023. 2111201336.html. (In Rus.) 17. Il’nitsky, A. M. Mental war of Russia. Military thought, no. 8, pp. 19–33, 2021. (In Rus.) 18. Ksenofontov, V. A. Mental security of the state. Proceedings of BSTU. Series 6: History, philosophy, no. 2, pp. 108–113, 2022. (In Rus.) 19. Butkevich, S. A. Prevention of threats to mental security: legal, criminological and psychological and pedagogical tools. Scholarly Notes of V. I. Vernadsky. Legal Sciences, no. 2, pp. 310–322, 2021. (In Rus.) 20. Korovnikova, N. A. Mental security in the era of digitalization. Social innovations and social sciences, no. 1, pp. 107–118, 2020. (In Rus.) 21. Litvinova, Yu. I., Obrinskaya, E. K. Organizational and functional elements of the state mechanism for counteracting mental threats. Philosophy of Law, no. 1, pp. 88–94, 2022. (In Rus.) 22. Hay, L. Heal your life. M: Olma Media Group, 2011. (In Rus.) 23. Sarkar, S., Punnoose, V. Cultural diversity and mental health. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry, no. 33, pp. 285, 2017. (In Engl.) 24. Arnold, I., Mulvale, G., Germann, K., Baynton, M. Opportunities Abound to Improve Mental Health and Psychological Safety in the Workplace. Healthcare Papers, no .11, pp. 85–90, 2011. (In Engl.) 25. Li, H., Han, Y., Xiao, Y., Liu, X., Li, A., Zhu, T. Suicidal Ideation Risk and Socio-Cultural Factors in China: A Longitudinal Study on Social Media from 2010 to 2018. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, no. 1098, pp. 1–14, 2021. (In Engl.) 26. Hofstede, G. Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 1, pp. 81–99, 1984. (In Engl.) 27. Langer, E. J. Mindfulness: choice and control in everyday life. London: Collins-Harvill, 1991. (In Engl.) 28. Frankl, V. Man in search of meaning. M.: Progress, 1990. (In Rus.) 29. Rozanov V. A. Stress and mental health (neurobiological aspects). Social and clinical psychiatry, no. 1, pp. 79–86, 2013. (In Rus.) 30. Young J., Klosko J., Weishaar M. Schema therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2006. (In Engl.)
Full articleThe Role of Philosophy in the Development of Strategies for Ensuring Mental Security in the Conditions of “Hybrid Wars” of Our Time