Article
Article name	Journalism in the Digital World: The Conflict of Institutional Logics
Authors	Kuznetsova E.I. Doctor of Philosophy, tvelena@mail.ru
Bibliographic description	Kuznetsova E. I. Journalism in the Digital World: The Conflict of Institutional Logics // Humanitarian Vector. 2024. Vol. 19, no. 3. P. 31–40. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2024-19-3-31-40.
Section	Journalism as a Form of Cultural Existence
UDK	101.1:316 УДК 316.77.001
DOI	10.21209/1996-7853-2024-19-3-31-40
Article type	Original article
Annotation	With the entry of humanity into the stage of digital development, all social institutions are undergoing profound changes. Journalism as an institution that arose as a result of information technology development in the XVI–XVII centuries, as a result of the digital revolution, is losing its dominant role in the new media space. The main core of the media system’s existence, its institutional nature, is undergoing significant changes in the context of increasing technological convergence and the development of the economic phenomenon of platform capitalism. The appeal to the problem is actualized by the need for updates in substantiating the ontological and functional characteristics of the institutionality of journalism in the context of rapid digitalization of the social environment. The purpose of the article is to study journalism as a transforming social institution in a competitive institutional environment. The methodology of the article is based on a dialectical approach in understanding the current state of the Institute of journalism, considering the existing contradictions and collisions as a moment in progressive development. One of the methods of analysis chosen is the direction of institutionalism, which is relevant to the sphere of functioning of social institutions – institutional logic. The system-structural and system-functional methods are used as an analysis tool. The results of the study indicate the identified ontological and functional changes in the state of the Institute of journalism. It is established that the loss of the status of a monopoly entity by journalism is caused not only by the impact of exogenous factors: a technological explosion, the emergence of new institutional and non-institutional subjects but also endogenous ones: structural changes, as well as a crisis of normative and value foundations. The novelty of the article is revealed in the understanding of journalism as a convergent ontological model, which forms the basis of its changing institutional status at the digital stage of its development.
Key words	journalism as a social institution, institutional approach, institutional and non-institutional subjects, institutional logic, media system, functional complex, digital platform
Article information
References	1. Pickard, V. Can Government Support the Press? Historicizing and Internationalizing a Policy Approach to the Journalism Crisis. The Communication Review, no. 14, pp. 73–95, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/10714421.2011.573430. (In Eng.) 2. Budarick, J. Media, Democracy and Pluralism: Exploring a Radical Response to the Crisis of Journalism. Journalism Studies, no. 24. P. 1–18, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2023.2173959. (In Eng.) 3. Stephen, D. Reese. The Crisis of the Institutional Press, Cambridge: Polity, 2021. (In Eng.) 4. The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: Democratic Culture, Professional Codes, Digital Future. Edited by J. C. Alexander, E. Butler Breese, M. Luengo Frontmatter. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016. (In Eng.) 5. Peters, Ch., Broersma M. Rethinking Journalism: Trust and Participation in a Transformed News Landscape. London: Routledge, 2013. DOI: 10.4324/9780203102688. (In Eng.) 6. Vartanova, E. L. Media system in the context of social processes: rethinking the theoretical design. Medi@l’manah, no. 2, pp. 8−19, 2023. DOI: 10.30547/mediaalm anah.2.2023.819 (In Rus.) 7. From the theory of journalism to the theory of media. Dynamics of media research in modern Russia. Еd. by E. L. Vartanova. M: Moscow Publishing House; Fac. Moscow State University Journal, 2019. (In Rus.) 8. Castells, M. The Information Age. Vol. 2: The Power of Identity. II, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2009. DOI: 10.1002/9781444318234. (In Eng.) 9. Hallin, D.C, Mancini, P. eds. Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Cambridge University Press; 2011. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139005098. (In Eng.) 10. McQuail, D. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. D. McQuail. Sage, London, 2005. (In Eng.) 11. Memoli, V., Splendore S. Media use and confidence in institutions: A comparative analysis of Hallin and Mancini’s three models. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica. 2014. DOI: 10.1426/77646. (In Eng.) 12. Baranova E. A. Transformation of the media institute in the context of media convergence. Kommunikologiya, no. 3, pp. 188–203, 2016. (In Rus.) 13. Fotieva, I. B., Semilet, T. A. Mutual transformations of essences and accidents of journalism in the information and media culture of the society. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki, no. 3, pp. 367–382, 2023. DOI: 10.17150/2308–6203.2023.12(3).367-382. EDN YOUUHO. (In Rus.) 14. Deuze, M., Witschge, T. Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism (Lond), Feb; 19 (2), pp. 165–181, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1464884916688550. (In Eng.) 15. Demina, I. N., Shkondin, M. V. Russian Media System: Methodological Aspects of Optimization. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki, no. 2, pp. 187–199, 2016. DOI: 10.17150/2308-6203.2016.5(2). (In Rus.) 16. Korkonosenko, S. G., Voskresenskaya, M. A. Journalism in the mode of culture: an institutional view. Socio-humanitarian knowledge, no. 4, pp. 109–119, 2020. (In Rus.) 17. Compton, J., Benedetti, P. Labor, New Media and the institutional restructuring of journalism. Research in the field of journalism, no. 11, pp. 487–499, 2010. DOI: 10.1080/14616701003638350. (In Eng.) 18. Korkonosenko, S. G. Theory of journalism: from schematism to realism. Questions of theory and practice of journalism, no. 4, pp. 536–545, 2016. (In Rus.) 19. Steensen, S., Ahva, L. Theories of journalism in the digital age. Digital Journalism, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2014.927984. (In Eng.) 20. Smirnova, O. V. Modern transformations of journalism in the focus of scientific analysis (traditions and innovations in research of the Department of Digital Journalism). Medi@l’manah, no. 4, pp. 16–25, 2022. (In Rus.) 21. Seibert, D., Planer, R., Godulla, A. Restarting virtual reality in journalism? A quantitative analysis of problems and potentials of selected immersive apps as perceived by their users. Studies in Communication and Media, no. 11, pp. 536–565, 2022. DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-4-536. (In Eng.) 22. Gladkova, A. А., Demina, I. N., Shkondin, M. V. Journalism as a factor of socio-psychological maturity of subjects of the civilizational process. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki, no. 2, pp. 296–309, 2023. DOI: 10.17150/2308-6203. (In Rus.) 23. Friedland, A., Bringing, R. Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. Ed. by W. W. Powell, P. J. DiMaggio. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 232–267. (In Eng.) 24. Shmerlina, I. A. “Institutional logic”: a critical analysis of the direction. Sociologicheskiy zhurnal, no. 4, pp. 110–138, 2016. (In Rus.) 25. Kuznetsova, E. I. Media convergence as a social phenomenon of a digital technogenic society. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura, no. 9, pp 18–21, 2021. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2021.9.2. (In Rus.) 26. Kin, D. Democracy and decadence of Media. M: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2015. (In Rus.) 27. Parker, D., Marshall, A., Chaudhary, S. The Platform Revolution. How network markets change the economy and how to make them work for you. M: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber. 2017. (In Rus.) 28. Ametovobla, D., Kirshner S. Organization of digital platforms: the role of digital technologies and architecture for social order. Journal of Sociology, no. 52, 2023. DOI: 10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2012. (In Eng.) 29. Seibt, D. Platform organizations and fields: studying the influence of field conditions on platformization processes. Critical sociology, no. 1, 2024. DOI: 10.1177/08969205231221444. (In Eng.) 30. Mitova, E., Sina, B., Strikovich, E., Urman, A., de Vrees S., Esser F. When Worlds Collide: Journalistic, Market and Technical Logic in the Implementation of News Recommendation Systems. Journalism Research, no. 24, pp. 1957–1976, 2023, DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2023.2260504. (In Eng.) 31. Lishka, J. A. Changeable institutional logic in digital journalism. Journal of Media Business Research, no. 17, pp. 113–131, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764. (In Eng.) 32. Saner, M., Meyer, K., Grasl, M. Mondejar, D., Kaltenbrunner, A., Lugshitz, R., Porlezza, S., Mazzoni, P., Garcia-Aviles, J. Innovations in journalism as a complex interaction: supporting and hindering factors in international comparison. Mass media and communications, no. 12, pp. 1–19, 2023. DOI: 10.17645/mac.7443. (In Eng.) 33. Arrese, A. Institutional and non-institutional news trust as predictors of COVID-19 beliefs: Evidence from three European countries. Public Understanding of Science, 2023. DOI: 10.1177/09636625231217081. (In Eng.) 34. Macek, J., Macková, A. Trust in Media in a Fragmented Media Environment: The Case of the Czech Republic, 2018. April. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20137.03686. (In Eng.) 35. Thorbjørnsrud, K., Figenschou, T. The Alarmed Citizen: Fear, Mistrust, and Alternative Media. Journalism Practice, no. 16, pp. 1–18, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2020.1825113. (In Eng.) 36. Oliver, M. B., Raney, Ar. Media Effects Research in Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, no. 100, pp. 793–807, 2023. DOI: 10.1177/10776990231203539. (In Eng.) 37. Sirén-Heikel, S., Kjellman, M., Lindén, C. At the crossroads of logics: Automating newswork with artificial intelligence defining journalistic logics from the perspective of technologists. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, no. 74, pp. 354–366, 2023. (In Eng.)
Full article	Journalism in the Digital World: The Conflict of Institutional Logics
	0
	0