| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Problem of Semantic Reconstruction of “Lekton” Category in the Early Stoics’ Philosophy |
| Authors | Sergeev D.V. Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, dvsergeev@inbox.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Sergeev D. V. Problem of Semantic Reconstruction of “Lekton” Category in the Early Stoics’ Philosophy // Humanitarian Vector. 2018. Vol. 13, No. 3. PP. 119–123. DOI: 10/21209/1996-7853-2018-13-3-119-123 |
| Section | PHILOSOPHY OF THINKING AND COGNITION |
| UDK | 122 |
| DOI | 10/21209/1996-7853-2018-13-3-119-123 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article deals with the problem of semantic reconstruction of the notion “lekton” in early stoics’ doxographical works. The author argues that the meaning of this notion is determined by the consensus among authors involved in the study of that Ancient Greek School. The argument is advanced that the meaning of the notion is a result of philosophers’ agreement on its denotation. The important procedure of gained results verification is semantic non-contradiction of the notion to principal and fundamental statements within the philosophical system as well as the correlation with the whole system of other notions. Among the foremost challenges aggravating the reconstruction procedure there are the lack of authentic early stoics’ works, transformations of stoic philosophy during many centuries, rethinking of main statements by both followers and antagonists. These factors determined the semantic changes of the notion “lekton”: inner speech, idea, thought, sound. The stoics’ logic advancement as a core of their philosophy urges researchers to find out similarities between the “lekton” notion and contemporary terms in analytical philosophy, logic and philosophy of the language. The use of the antique notion “lekton” by contemporary philosopher can be also explained by their desire to buttress scientific position because procedure and tradition of scientific knowledge legitimize search for the similar notion in order to prove own theoretical view. |
| Key words | lekton, early stoics, semantic reconstruction, meaning, doxographical literature |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Losev, A. F. Sign. Symbol. Myth. M: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1982. (In Rus.) 2. L’yuis, K. I. The modes of meaning. Semiotika: Antologiya. Sost., Stepanov, Yu. S. M: Akademicheskij proekt; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 2001: 227–241. (In Rus.) 3. Nekhaev, A. V. Logic-semiotics aspects of stoic’s doctrine. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo, no. 14 (109), pp. 180–187, 2011. (In Rus.) 4. Rassel, B. M. A History of Western Philosophy. In 2 books. Book 1. M: Mif, 1993. (In Rus.) 5. Stepanov, Yu. S. In the Three Dimensions of the Language (the Semiotic Researchers of Linguistics, Philosophy, Art). M: Nauka, 1985. (In Rus.) 6. Stolyarov, A. A. Background. Corpus of Early Stoics’ Texts: Formation Principles and Main Editions. Early Stoics’ Fragments. Vol. 1. Zeno and his Followers. M: Greko-latinskij kabinet Yu. A. Shichalina, 1998: IX – XXI. (In Rus.) 7. Stolyarov, A. A. The Stoa and Stoicism. M: AO Kami Grup, 1995. (In Rus.) 8. Surovtsev, V. A. To lekton in Stoic Philosophy and Sinn in G. Frege’s Semantic Theory: the question of their relationship: the question of their ontological status. Schole. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, no. 2 (10), pp. 452 – 470, 2016. (In Rus.) 9. Early Stoics’ Fragments. Vol. 1. Zeno and his Followers / Translated and commented by A. A. Stolyarova. M: Greko-latinskij kabinet Yu. A. Shichalina, 1998. (In Rus.) 10. Early Stoics’ Fragments. Tom II. Chrysippus of Soli. Part 1. Logical and Physical Fragments. Translated and commented by A. A. Stolyarova. M: Greko-latinskij kabinet Yu. A. Shichalina, 1999. (In Rus.) 11. Bakalis, N. Handbook of Greek Philosophy: From Thales to the Stoics. Analysis and Fragments. Victoria: Trafford Publishing, 2005. (In Eng.) 12. Becker, C. L. A New Stoicism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017. (In Eng.) 13. Brennan, N. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. (In Eng.) 14. Lachs, J. Stoic Pragmatism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012. (In Eng.) 15. Robertson, D. The Philosophy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Stoicism as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy. London: Karnac, 2010. (In Eng.) |
| Full article | Problem of Semantic Reconstruction of “Lekton” Category in the Early Stoics’ Philosophy |
| 0 | |
| 13 | |
