Article
Article name	Oughtness and Normativity in a Philosophy of the Act by M. Bakhtin
Authors	Sychev A.A. Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, sychevaa@mail.ru
Bibliographic description	Sychev A. A. Oughtness and Normativity in a Philosophy of the Act by M. Bakhtin // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 2. PP. 42–47. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-2-42-47.
Section	PHILOSOPHY OF MAN
UDK	111.6
DOI	10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-2-42-47
Article type
Annotation	A Philosophy of the Act by M. Bakhtin is regarded as an original metaphysical concept offering a direct path from facts to moral action, bypassing the link of theoretical normativity. Normativity in this case is understood not as the determining basis for action but just as auxiliary material for decision-making. At the same time, the problem of oughtness understood as a special orientation of consciousness responsible for converting opportunities into actions is brought to the foreground. It is shown that the moral oughtness is determined by the unique, dialogic and polyphonic nature of human existence. These characteristics not only describe the specifics of a person’s being but also act as imperatives orienting person’s actions in the world and in the aggregate defining the basis of his obligation. Human existence was viewed by Bakhtin as being-to-uniqueness, opposed to all uniformity. It manifests itself not as passivity and obedience to norms but as an active and creative oughtness oriented towards finding a unique place in being. Movement in the opposite direction is equivalent to refusal from personal existence. Dialogue in the philosophy by Bakhtin is both an ontological and deontological category. Since only the other ensures my existence, he is my actual creator, guarantor and judge, it is his very existence which obliges me to acts aimed at his good. Finally, polyphony implies the rejection of a privileged position in being and recognition of the admissibility and equality of various positions (including opposing ones). The polyphonic approach returns the problem of normativity to moral philosophy, turning it into one of the facets of oughtness.
Key words	Mikhail Bakhtin, a Philosophy of the Act, oughtness, normativity, uniqueness, dialogue, polyphony
Article information
References	1. Averintsev, S. S. Page notes. Bakhtin M. M. Collected works in 7 vol. Vol. 1. M: Russkie slovari, 2003: 438–456. (In Rus.) 2. Aleksandrova, R. I. Moral philosophy and creative heritage of M. M. Bakhtin. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordov. un-ta, 1995. (In Rus.) 3. Bakhtin, M. M. Toward a Philosophy of The Act. Collected works in 7 vol. Vol. 1. M: Russkie slovari, 2003: 7–68. (In Rus.) 4. Bakhtin, M. M. Problems of Dostoevsky’s art. Collected works in 7. Vol. 2. M: Russkie slovari, 2000: 7–174. (In Rus.) 5. Gegel, G. Philosophy of law. Works. Vol. VII. M: Sotsekgiz, 1934. 6. Gogotishvili, L. A. On the possible source of Bakhtin’s polyphonic idea Vox. Philosophical magazin, no. 17, pp. 118–154, 2014. (In Rus.) 7. Gogotishvili, L. A. Page notes. Bakhtin M. M. Collected works in 7 vol. Vol. 1. M: Russkie slovari, 2003: 457–492. (In Rus.) 8. Guseinov, A. A. Law and deed (Aristotle, Kant, M. M. Bakhtin). Ethical thought, no. 2, pp. 3–26, 2001. (In Rus.) 9. Guseinov, A. A Philosophy of the Act as the first philosophy (experience of interpretation of moral philosophy by M. M. Bakhtin). Article one: to Be means to Act. Questions of philosophy, no. 6, pp. 5–15, 2017. (In Rus.) 10. Guseinov, A. A. A philosophy of the act as the first philosophy. (Experience of interpretation of M. M. Bakhtin’s moral philosophy.) Article two: the first philosophy as a moral philosophy. Questions of philosophy, no. 7, pp. 65–74, 2017. (In Rus.) 11. Krivosheev, A. V. Place of duty in the ontological project of a philosophy of the act by M. M. Bakhtin. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, no. 1–4, pp. 102–106, 2009. (In Rus.) 12. Rikkert, G. Science of nature and science of culture. M: Respublika, 1998. (In Rus.) 13. Rogozha, M. M. Moral act and moral action: evaluation criteria. Ethical thought, no.10, pp.39–60, 2010. (In Rus.) 14. Yum, D. Treatise on human nature, or an Attempt to apply an experience-based method of reasoning to moral subjects. Collected works. In 2 vol. M: Mysl’, 1996. V. 1: 53–656. (In Rus.) 15. Singer. P. On Triviality of the Debate over “Is-ought” and the Definition of “Moral”. Unsanctifying Human Life. Oxford, 2002. pp. 17–26. (In Engl.)
Full article	Oughtness and Normativity in a Philosophy of the Act by M. Bakhtin
	0
	0